Indigenous mental healthcare and human rights abuses in Nigeria: The role of cultural syntonicity and stigmatization

Abstract

BackgroundIndigenous mental healthcare using traditional non-western methods termed “unorthodox approaches” has been observed in Nigeria historically. This has been largely due to a cultural preference for spiritual or mystical rather than biomedical formulations of mental disorder. Yet, there have been recent concerns about human rights abuses within such treatment settings as well as their tendency to perpetuate stigmatization.AimThe aim of this review was to examine the cultural framework for indigenous mental healthcare in Nigeria, the role of stigmatization in its utilization and interrogate the issues of human rights abuses within a public mental health context.MethodsThis is a non-systematic narrative review of published literature on mental disorders, mental health service utilization, cultural issues, stigma, and indigenous mental healthcare. Media and advocacy reports related to human rights abuses in indigenous mental health treatment settings were also examined. International conventions on human rights and torture, national criminal legislation, constitutional provisions on fundamental rights and medical ethics guidelines relevant to patient care within the country were examined in order to highlight provisions regarding human rights abuses within the context of care.ResultsIndigenous mental healthcare in Nigeria is culturally syntonic, has a complex interaction with stigmatization and is associated with incidents of human rights abuses especially torture of different variants. Three systemic responses to indigenous mental healthcare in Nigeria include: orthodox dichotomization, interactive dimensionalization, and collaborative shared care. Conclusions: Indigenous mental healthcare is endemic in Nigeria. Orthodox dichotomization is unlikely to produce a meaningful care response. Interactive dimensionalization provides a realistic psychosocial explanation for the utilization of indigenous mental healthcare. Collaborative shared care involving measured collaboration between orthodox mental health practitioners and indigenous mental health systems offers an effective as well as cost-effective intervention strategy. It reduces harmful effects of indigenous mental healthcare including human rights abuses and offers patients a culturally appropriate response to their problems

Inovasi dalam Advokasi Hak Asasi Manusia: Strategi dan Pendekatan Hukum

“…Namun demikian, pendekatan ini menimbulkan tantangan terkait dengan verifikasi dan informasi yang berlebihan, yang membuat para profesional hak asasi manusia skeptis akan kegunaannya. Selain kemajuan teknologi ini, advokasi hak asasi manusia telah berkembang untuk mengatasi berbagai masalah, seperti perawatan kesehatan jiwa masyarakat adat di Nigeria (Ogunwale et al, 2023), hak-hak anak di era digital (Livingstone & Third, 2017), dan hak-hak imigran di Amerika Serikat (Chen, 2023). Upaya-upaya ini sering kali melibatkan penggunaan pengadilan, protes rakyat, advokasi kebijakan, dan strategi kampanye inovatif lainnya untuk membela hak-hak kelompok yang terpinggirkan.…”

The Role of the Media and Self-Compassion in Enhancing Mental Health and Preventing Suicide among Nigerian Youth: A Literature Review

“…The inflation rate continues to deteriorate, resulting in a high rate of youth unemployment and consequent negative impacts on the mental health of many individuals [23,24]. In addition, there is a high level of shame and stigma associated with mental illness [25,26], resulting in incidents of suicide [27], and adequate mental healthcare is not easily accessible and affordable for those who need it in the country [13].…”