2012
DOI: 10.4324/9780203022733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenous Modernities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, and by contrast with other European colonial cities in India (Abu-Lughod, 1980;Bethencourt & Adrian, 2012;Boxer, 1988;Chattopadhyay, 2005;Çelik, 1997;Mitter, 1986, p. 102;Glover, 2007;Hosagrahar, 2005;Rabinow, 1992, pp. 167-182;Wright, 1991), no racial segregation happened in Diu (Portuguese Overseas Historical Archives [AHU], 1612 ;Rivara, 1857Rivara, -1866.…”
Section: The Color Linementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, and by contrast with other European colonial cities in India (Abu-Lughod, 1980;Bethencourt & Adrian, 2012;Boxer, 1988;Chattopadhyay, 2005;Çelik, 1997;Mitter, 1986, p. 102;Glover, 2007;Hosagrahar, 2005;Rabinow, 1992, pp. 167-182;Wright, 1991), no racial segregation happened in Diu (Portuguese Overseas Historical Archives [AHU], 1612 ;Rivara, 1857Rivara, -1866.…”
Section: The Color Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hosagrahar thus, argues that Delhi's colonial urban forms were the result of local adaptations to Western ideals and were neither purely "Indian" nor purely "Western" creations. Instead, the products of colonial urban restructuring evinced "the elusive, contradictory, tentative, negotiated, and fluid" through material juxtapositions of older and newer, local and foreign elements (Chattopadhyay, 2005;Glover, 2007;Hosagrahar, 2005;Kidambi, 2007;Legg, 2007). Early 1980s works about the colonial city inaugurated this analysis on a broader geographical scope (Abu-Lughod, 1980;Çelik, 1997;Cohen & Eleb, 2002;Crinson, 2003;Fuller, 2007;Mclaren, 2006;Metcalf, 2002;Prochaska, 1990;Rabinow, 1980;Wright, 1991).…”
Section: The First "European" Diumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hosagrahar has highlighted hybrid spaces and spatial practices in colonial Delhi articulating the concept of ''indigenous modernities'' although a more appropriate term would be ''indigenized modernities'' given that social and environmental changes in this period (1857-1947) were attributable to imported, not indigenous, concepts and mechanisms. 47 Changes in habits of perception and spatial behavior in response to new forms of domestic and urban spaces were facilitated by life in Company built housing (with few desirable options for living elsewhere), particularly among those from small towns and rural areas. Hybrid spaces created through modification of existing designed structures were not allowed.…”
Section: Legaciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their presence in streets and bazaars, moreover, aroused concerns about obstructions to the circulation of traffic, drainage and sanitation works and thus left colonial authorities fearful about disease and disorder in the city. 16 In Delhi, the construction and use of chabutras (masonry or wooden platforms) intersected with the municipality's designs to reorganise the city into neat divisions of public and private spaces and often came under scrutiny as 'encroachments'. Not surprisingly, the regulation of these structures produced confrontations between the municipality and different sections of the population from time to time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%