INDIGENOUS MOVEMENTS IN LATIN AMERICA, 1992–2004: Controversies, Ironies, New Directions

Abstract

This review examines literature on indigenous movements in Latin America from 1992 to 2004. It addresses ethnic identity and ethnic activism, in particular the reindianization processes occurring in indigenous communities throughout the region. We explore the impact that states and indigenous mobilizing efforts have had on each other, as well as the role of transnational nongovernmental organizations and para-statal organizations, neoliberalism more broadly, and armed conflict. Shifts in ethnoracial, political, and cultural indigenous discourses are examined, special attention being paid to new deployments of rhetorics concerned with political imaginaries, customary law, culture, and identity. Self-representational strategies will be numerous and dynamic, identities themselves multiple, fluid, and abundantly positional. The challenges these dynamics present for anthropological field research and ethnographic writing are discussed, as is the dialogue between scholars, indigenous and not, and activists, indigenous and not. Conclusions suggest potentially fruitful research directions for the future.

Ecologies of adaptation for Mexican Indigenous im/migrant children and families in the United States: Implications for Latino studies

“…Although progress has been made in recognizing these rights, politics and policies have been less effective in addressing the inequality and marginality of Indigenous communities (Jackson and Warren 2005). In addition to the material consequences of this continued marginality, invisibility and exclusion (i.e., high poverty levels among Indigenous communities; Bartolome 1998;Bracamonte y Sosa and Lizama-Quijano 2003), there are significant social and psychological implications, such as discrimination, depression and alcohol abuse (Ortiz-Hernańdez et al 2011).…”

Etnicidad maya en Yucatán: balances y nuevas rutas de investigación

“…Si bien las diversas expresiones de la etnicidad maya en Yucatán en la actualidad están redefiniendo las nociones hegemónicas de la "indigeneidad", un elemento importante a indagar es si estas redefiniciones sólo implican una transformación de los elementos discursivos sobre lo que significa ser indígena y de los sistemas clasificatorios en los que se enmarca lo indígena (Jackson y Warren, 2005; De la Cadena y Starn, 2009), o si también estas transformaciones simbóli-cas sobre la indigeneidad y el ser maya están teniendo impacto en la distribución del poder y de los recursos materiales en el estado.…”

Sources of Civic Engagement in Latin America: Empirical Evidence from Rural Ecuadorian Communities

“…A lot of case studies suggest that indigenous people are more likely to participate in public affairs because participation is deeply anchored in the indigenous tradition as an instrument to express their own demands (Mun˜oz 1999, Ortiz, 1999Torres, 1999;Peralta et al, 2008). The case studies reveal that the indigenous tradition is characterised by norms of reciprocity as well as nonhierarchical forms of cooperation (Jackson and Warren, 2005). Civic engagement as a form of participation in public life might be taken more for granted in these communities than in others (Mun˜oz, 1999;Bebbington, 2001).…”

“…Furthermore, indigenous people had previously been living in disastrous conditions. Cooperation or working together was the only possible way in the struggle against repression (Bebbington and Perreault, 2001;Ortiz, 2003;Jackson and Warren, 2005). Hence, according to hypothesis eight, a high ratio of indigenous people corresponds to a high level of civic engagement (H8).…”