The Biology of Deer 1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2782-3_100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigestible Particulate Passage in White-Tailed Deer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Passage rate ultimately determines fiber digestion (Huston et al 1986). These factors (passage rate, low cellulose digestion, and tannin formed insoluble complexes) might have accounted for the low DMD of guajillo during the late summer and fall periods especially since passage rate of guajillo is fastest during the late summer period (Barnes et al 1991).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Passage rate ultimately determines fiber digestion (Huston et al 1986). These factors (passage rate, low cellulose digestion, and tannin formed insoluble complexes) might have accounted for the low DMD of guajillo during the late summer and fall periods especially since passage rate of guajillo is fastest during the late summer period (Barnes et al 1991).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CP content of the browse rations were well above the 6 to 8% required for minimal ruminal function, but available protein became low as the forages matured and tannin levels increased. Protein precipitation during the late summer and fall periods was exacerbated due to low quantities of NDFN being digested, which may be a function of rapid passage of fiber particles (Barnes et al 1991) or tanninprotein complexes (Reed 1986, Reed et al 1990).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated the retention time of chemically labeled foods in white-tailed deer digestive tracts (Mautz and Petrides 1971, Jenks and Leslie 1989, Barnes et al 1992. The distribution of retention times after the first appearance of label is approximately log normal, and the compartment models of Pond et al (1988) for passage through ruminant digestive tracts provide excellent fits to data (Jenks andLeslie 1989, Barnes et al 1992).…”
Section: Seed Shadows Generated By Deermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is also realistic for Trillium in that its seeds are relatively large and heavy, and such seeds pass most rapidly through ruminant digestive tracts (Gardener et al 1993). To estimate RT, we first fit the G2 two-compartment model of Pond et al (1988) to a data set in Barnes et al (1992) reporting the concentration of chemical label defecated over time (r 2 ϭ 0.99). The G2 two-compartment model combines a gamma distribution of residence times in one digestive compartment, and an exponential distribution in a second digestive compartment (Pond et al 1988).…”
Section: Seed Shadows Generated By Deermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vellend et al (2003) projected that white-tailed deer could disperse native Trillium grandiflorum seeds up to 4 km from the parent plant. Maximum elk home ranges are estimated at 1590 ha (Szmenthy et al, 1994) or 4000 m in length (Pakeman, 2001) and gut retention times are similar to deer (Barnes et al, 1992;Milne et al, 1978). So elk can potentially disperse seeds at least as far as deer are capable.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%