2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

INDIGO – INtegrated Data Warehouse of MIcrobial GenOmes with Examples from the Red Sea Extremophiles

Abstract: BackgroundThe next generation sequencing technologies substantially increased the throughput of microbial genome sequencing. To functionally annotate newly sequenced microbial genomes, a variety of experimental and computational methods are used. Integration of information from different sources is a powerful approach to enhance such annotation. Functional analysis of microbial genomes, necessary for downstream experiments, crucially depends on this annotation but it is hampered by the current lack of suitable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
79
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these 125 genome sequences collected, 76 are complete genomes and 49 are draft genomes [78] (Additional file 1: Table S4). To standardize the annotation of the 125 cyanobacterial genomes, all genome sequences were re-annotated using the INDIGO pipeline [79] to obtain consistent annotation. Based on that annotation, we derived proteomes of the considered species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 125 genome sequences collected, 76 are complete genomes and 49 are draft genomes [78] (Additional file 1: Table S4). To standardize the annotation of the 125 cyanobacterial genomes, all genome sequences were re-annotated using the INDIGO pipeline [79] to obtain consistent annotation. Based on that annotation, we derived proteomes of the considered species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To annotate the four metagenomes, we used the Automatic Annotation of Microbial Genomes (AAMG) module in DMAP (Alam et al, 2013). The AAMG includes annotation from various databases such as InterProScan (Quevillon et al, 2005), Gene…”
Section: Feature Prediction Annotation Of Function and Taxonomic Assmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We took a different approach by aligning the predicted ORFs and rRNA from each of the replicates against the Best Global Taxonomies (Alam et al, 2013). We opted to predict the abundance by aligning the predicted ORFs and rRNA against GBT because of it"s ability to obtain insights into complex gene structure, which would not be possible to obtain from short read data.…”
Section: Feature Prediction Annotation Of Function and Taxonomic Assmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome annotation was carried out with the Indigo pipeline (12) with the exception of open reading frame (ORF) prediction by FragGeneScan (13). The annotation of H. elongata strain K4 resulted in 2,354 ORFs, 5 rRNAs, 59 tRNAs, and 39 ncRNAs.…”
Section: Genome Announcementmentioning
confidence: 99%