2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27994-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect comparison of efficacy and safety between immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic therapy in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer

Abstract: In this study, we conducted an indirect comparison analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors with those of antiangiogenic therapy—two effective treatment methods for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligible randomised control trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors, antiangiogenic therapy, and doublet platinum-based therapy published up to July 2017 were comprehensively analysed. Through the indirect comparison analysis of 37 trials involving 16810 patients, treatm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Endostar-Chemo ranked the worst for OS benefits. The reason of worse efficacy of anti-angio-chemo may be associated with the resistant mechanism and compensatory pathway of angiogenesis in tumor [ 90 ]. PD-1 inhibitors in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy hold the potential to prolong patients’ life expectancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Endostar-Chemo ranked the worst for OS benefits. The reason of worse efficacy of anti-angio-chemo may be associated with the resistant mechanism and compensatory pathway of angiogenesis in tumor [ 90 ]. PD-1 inhibitors in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy hold the potential to prolong patients’ life expectancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%