1993
DOI: 10.1002/jccs.199300067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect Determination of Sulfate by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry

Abstract: With a flow injection technique, the content of sulfate in solution was determined indirectly from the concentration of partially equilibrated barium ion in solution. To obtain improved sensitivity, atomic absorption spectrophotometry of a flame was used to determine barium. With these procedures combined with a linear calibration graph, superior sensitivity and detection limit of sulfate determination were obtained compared with those from other indirect methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raman spectroscopy has also been reported for the determination of sulfate ions dissolved in pore water of sediments [ 10 ], and it realized the diurnal variability change monitoring of the SO 4 2− intensity of offshore seawater [ 11 ]. Other techniques have been adopted to determine sulfate concentration, such as titration [ 12 , 13 ], atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) [ 14 , 15 ], ion chromatography (IC) [ 16 , 17 ], spectrophotometry [ 18 ], atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (AFS) [ 19 ], and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) [ 20 , 21 ]. Optical fiber sensors have many advantages compared with those detection methods: energy savings, high sensitivity, strong resistance to electromagnetic interference, enabling continuous remote monitoring, compactness, flexible shape, and real-time detection capability [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raman spectroscopy has also been reported for the determination of sulfate ions dissolved in pore water of sediments [ 10 ], and it realized the diurnal variability change monitoring of the SO 4 2− intensity of offshore seawater [ 11 ]. Other techniques have been adopted to determine sulfate concentration, such as titration [ 12 , 13 ], atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) [ 14 , 15 ], ion chromatography (IC) [ 16 , 17 ], spectrophotometry [ 18 ], atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (AFS) [ 19 ], and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) [ 20 , 21 ]. Optical fiber sensors have many advantages compared with those detection methods: energy savings, high sensitivity, strong resistance to electromagnetic interference, enabling continuous remote monitoring, compactness, flexible shape, and real-time detection capability [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%