2012
DOI: 10.1021/je2013186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect Determination of Vapor Pressures by Capillary Gas–Liquid Chromatography: Analysis of the Reference Vapor-Pressure Data and Their Treatment

Abstract: Knowledge of low vapor pressures p 0 is indispensible for modeling the fate of chemicals in the environment as well as for other important applications. The indirect determination of vapor pressures by the capillary gas−liquid chromatography−relative retention time (GLC−RT) technique has attracted the attention of many research groups, and two review papers devoted to this topic have already been published. To complement these reviews, the quality of the literature vapor pressures for reference compounds is an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 198 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] It is usual that the interlaboratory agreement on experimental data on sublimation properties of low volatile species is rather poor. [4][5][6] Moreover, empiric and semi-empiric estimative methods for predictions, based for example on the quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) models, are not generally reliable or purely predictive, although effort is still exerted in this area. 7,8 On the other hand, the rapid increase of number of known chemical species and corresponding resolved crystal structures does not correlate with the amount of available experimental data on sub ∆ Htypically sublimation data are known for thousands of compounds while millions of crystal structures have been resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] It is usual that the interlaboratory agreement on experimental data on sublimation properties of low volatile species is rather poor. [4][5][6] Moreover, empiric and semi-empiric estimative methods for predictions, based for example on the quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) models, are not generally reliable or purely predictive, although effort is still exerted in this area. 7,8 On the other hand, the rapid increase of number of known chemical species and corresponding resolved crystal structures does not correlate with the amount of available experimental data on sub ∆ Htypically sublimation data are known for thousands of compounds while millions of crystal structures have been resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the ratio of infinite-dilution activity coefficients of target compounds to co-chromatographed reference standards (γ t /γ ref ) is not equal to unity. 3,15,24,25 As a consequence, the enthalpy of the phase transfer from the GC silicone stationary phase to the gas phase differs somewhat from Δ VAP H/kJ•mol −1 . 17, 25 for calibration compounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,15,24,25 As a consequence, the enthalpy of the phase transfer from the GC silicone stationary phase to the gas phase differs somewhat from Δ VAP H/kJ•mol −1 . 17, 25 for calibration compounds. The latter can be calculated as the standard prediction error as described.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vaporization enthalpy (and vapor pressure of supercooled liquid in [15]) was determined using indirect gas-liquid chromatography (GLC) method by Hoskovec et al [16] and by Chickos and coworkers [13,15]. It is outside the scope of this work to analyze the reasons for differences between published values and recommendation of this work (see Table 13); a general analysis of results obtained by the GLC method was recently published by Koutek and coworkers [60,61]. It is however necessary to mention that results of the GLC method are substantially influenced by i) the choice of reference compounds and quality of their reference vapor pressure data and ii) the length of extrapolation since chromatographic measurements are usually performed well above room temperature, while the results are reported down to 298 K. Hoskovec et al [16] [43]).…”
Section: Mutual Consistency Of the Studied Thermodynamic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%