2017
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect effects of ecosystem engineering combine with consumer behaviour to determine the spatial distribution of herbivory

Abstract: Ecosystem engineers alter environments by creating, modifying or destroying habitats. The indirect impacts of ecosystem engineering on trophic interactions should depend on the combination of the spatial distribution of engineered structures and the foraging behaviour of consumers that use these structures as refuges. In this study, we assessed the indirect effects of ecosystem engineering by a wood-boring beetle in a neotropical mangrove forest system. We identified herbivory patterns in a dwarf mangrove fore… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the results of our study suggest that invasive ecosystem engineers can exert TMIEs on parasites, which is a novel mechanism of how invasive species can affect recipient ecosystems. Given the increasing evidence that ecosystem engineers in general can exert manifold indirect effects on species interactions and food webs (White and O'Donnell 2010;Sanders et al 2014;Wetzel et al 2016;Griffen et al 2017;Mourant et al 2017), it seems highly likely that many of these indirect effects will also trigger TMIEs (and also DMIEs) on parasites if they include changes in the behaviour or density of species that serve as hosts for parasites. Hence, indirect effects of invasive ecosystem engineers on parasite-host interactions in recipient ecosystems may be much more common than realized today and they possibly add significantly to the known diversity of impacts of invasive ecosystems engineers (Crooks 2002;Guy-Haim et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the results of our study suggest that invasive ecosystem engineers can exert TMIEs on parasites, which is a novel mechanism of how invasive species can affect recipient ecosystems. Given the increasing evidence that ecosystem engineers in general can exert manifold indirect effects on species interactions and food webs (White and O'Donnell 2010;Sanders et al 2014;Wetzel et al 2016;Griffen et al 2017;Mourant et al 2017), it seems highly likely that many of these indirect effects will also trigger TMIEs (and also DMIEs) on parasites if they include changes in the behaviour or density of species that serve as hosts for parasites. Hence, indirect effects of invasive ecosystem engineers on parasite-host interactions in recipient ecosystems may be much more common than realized today and they possibly add significantly to the known diversity of impacts of invasive ecosystems engineers (Crooks 2002;Guy-Haim et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orwin et al, 2016), depending on who benefits. The beetle Elaphidion mimeticum creates holes on mangrove trees that can be subsequently used as refuges by mangrove tree crabs, Aratus pisonii, leading to an increase in crab herbivory on mangrove plants (Griffen et al, 2017). Gall forming species on plants often provide shelter for natural enemies, thereby increasing top-town control.…”
Section: Habitat Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%