2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect identification of continuous-time delay systems from step responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods require the step response to be relatively noise-free so that the true process response can be seen clearly. Recent and alternative schemes are presented in [20,21].…”
Section: Process Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods require the step response to be relatively noise-free so that the true process response can be seen clearly. Recent and alternative schemes are presented in [20,21].…”
Section: Process Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: 1) sensor is fail at some instants; 2) data are missing during transmission; 3) time-scale uncertainly drifts so that data become blank at some important instants; 4) improperly large sampling period is selected, leading to available data is less than that needed by identification; and so on. Although emerging many new algorithms on step identification [8][9][10][11][12], they are also difficult to directly apply for above-mentioned cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is quite challenging to identify a transfer function model with time delay due to the nonlinear relationship between the delay and other model parameters, especially in the presence of measurement noise. Based on step or relay tests, a few synthetic identification methods have been developed for time delay systems [2,8,9]. However, these methods could not deal with colored noise in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%