2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0503-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect interactions between browsers and seed predators affect the seed bank dynamics of a chaparral shrub

Abstract: Interactions between herbivores and seed predators may have long-term consequences for plant populations that rely on persistent seed banks for recovery after unpredictable fires. We assessed the effects of browsing by deer and seed predation by rodents, ants and birds on the densities of seeds entering the seed bank of Ceanothus cuneatus var. rigidus, a maritime chaparral shrub in coastal California. Ceanothus produced many more seeds when protected from browsers in long-term experimental exclosures than did … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Neotropical savannas, seeds of most common woody species do not form persistent but seasonal transient soil seed-banks (Salazar et al 2011). Short-lived soil seed-banks further increase the magnitude of seed limitation because viable seeds do not accumulate in the soil over time and cannot recruit into the population even during a productive seed year for that species (Deveny and Fox 2006;Clark et al 2007;Zobel et al 2000;Moles and Westoby 2002). Although seed limitation does not necessary reduce seedling recruitment (Orrock et al 2006), it is highly likely that the combination of poor seed dispersal among sites, post-dispersal seed loss, and short-lived soil seed-banks enhance seed limitation reducing the potential seedling recruitment of woody species in tropical savannas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Neotropical savannas, seeds of most common woody species do not form persistent but seasonal transient soil seed-banks (Salazar et al 2011). Short-lived soil seed-banks further increase the magnitude of seed limitation because viable seeds do not accumulate in the soil over time and cannot recruit into the population even during a productive seed year for that species (Deveny and Fox 2006;Clark et al 2007;Zobel et al 2000;Moles and Westoby 2002). Although seed limitation does not necessary reduce seedling recruitment (Orrock et al 2006), it is highly likely that the combination of poor seed dispersal among sites, post-dispersal seed loss, and short-lived soil seed-banks enhance seed limitation reducing the potential seedling recruitment of woody species in tropical savannas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tube was fixed to the soil with U-shaped wire (Castro et al 1999;Deveny and Fox 2006;Jacob et al 2006;Fig. 1b).…”
Section: Seed Removal Trials With Seed Remover Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the University of California, Fort Ord Natural Reserve, where we conducted our studies, abnormally heavy deer browsing limits population viability of Ceanothus cuneatus var. rigidus (Rhamnaceae), a shrub species of special concern [14]. Because a large proportion of C.r.l.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire suppression in Mediterranean-climates has changed the trajectory of many plant communities, threatening some natives that rely on post-fire habitats ([16]). The Monterey Bay area was subjected to frequent (yearly) intentional burning by Native Americans [17], but aerial photographs indicate that the Fort Ord area has not burned for at least 60 years [14]. We are not aware of previous work on fire-dependency in C.r.l.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%