2007
DOI: 10.1108/01437730710835489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect leadership: a quantitative test of a qualitatively developed model

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to explore the applicability of a previously developed model of indirect leadership (qualitative Grounded Theory case study) in a broader military context. Design/methodology/approach -The model was operationalised to specific questionnaires for high-level managers, middle-level managers, and lower-level employees. Data were obtained from 147 Norwegian and 134 Swedish military officers, representing all three levels, and serving in the Army and Air Force respectively. Find… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few of the individual's antecedent factors are also consistent with the model of indirect leadership developed by Larsson et al (2007). Specifically, the leader's need to build a positive organizational image for their leadership role inside and outside of the organization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…A few of the individual's antecedent factors are also consistent with the model of indirect leadership developed by Larsson et al (2007). Specifically, the leader's need to build a positive organizational image for their leadership role inside and outside of the organization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Brunelle's (2013) research with mobile workers describes their work context as one in which managers must be able to influence subordinates by means of asynchronous, remote communications rather than rely upon face-to-face interactions. Transformational leadership, which involves communicating a vision, creating meaning, empowering employees, and delegating, improves teleworkers' mental representations of effective behaviors to be adopted and facilitates teleworkers' identification with the organization and/or with their manager (Larsson, Sjöberg, Nilsson, Alvinius, & Bakken, 2007). Using a transformational leadership style may therefore enable managers to compensate for the potentially negative effects of distance on teleworkers' job-related attitudes (Brunelle, 2013).…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When employees cannot rely on supervisor or peer support to deal with political games, they may suffer a limited understanding of the source or reasons for such decision making (Bass & Riggio, 2006). Because organizational decision making is not transparent, they likely fear that they will be unable to meet formal work obligations (Chen et al, 2012;Larsson, Sjöberg, Nilsson, Alvinius, & Bakken, 2007), which reduces the likelihood that they take on additional, voluntary activities. Employees' ability to draw from their personal resilience then should be particularly useful for addressing the performance harms of POP (Abbas et al, 2014).…”
Section: Hypothesis 4: the Negative Relationship Between Employees' Pmentioning
confidence: 99%