2009
DOI: 10.2514/1.38170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect Optimization of Three-Dimensional Finite-Burning Interplanetary Transfers Including Spiral Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that state differential equations (1) (2) and Hamiltonian (9) are all linear with respect to the magnitude of thrust u, whose admissible domain is closed, i.e., u∈[0,1]. Thus the optimal thrust magnitude u is derived as bangbang control in the following.…”
Section: Fuel Optimal Low Thrust Rendezvousmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that state differential equations (1) (2) and Hamiltonian (9) are all linear with respect to the magnitude of thrust u, whose admissible domain is closed, i.e., u∈[0,1]. Thus the optimal thrust magnitude u is derived as bangbang control in the following.…”
Section: Fuel Optimal Low Thrust Rendezvousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And what's worse, without an account of the physics underlying the optimal guidance problem, it's not reasonable to expect too much from the direct method with regard to the global optimality of its results, as GALLOP claims, i.e., gravity-assisted low-thrust local optimization program. Indirect method [6][7][8][9][10] in trajectory optimization, on the other hand, taking into account more intrinsic optimal structures, unveiled by the optimal control theory [11][12][13], especially PMP, is believed likely to provide one with more reliable global optimal results at much fewer computation costs. However, difficulties from the indirect method seem formidable when the fuel optimal low thrust trajectory is treated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been adopted to compute good initial guesses for low‐thrust trajectories or atmospheric flight applications, as shown, for example, in . In , the generic approach consists in solving a simpler problem with analytic results to approximate the optimal initial adjoints in the full problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More physical meaning can be given to the initial estimates of the unknowns with the use of an adjoint control transformation (ACT) . The velocity adjoints can be related to the velocity change, in particular, to the direction of the impulse vector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proc IMechE Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 228(14) at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on December 13, 2014 pig.sagepub.com Downloaded from…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%