2015
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/20/7847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect radio-chemo-beta therapy: a targeted approach to increase biological efficiency of x-rays based on energy

Abstract: Tehei, M. (2015). Indirect radio-chemo-beta therapy: a targeted approach to increase biological efficiency of x-rays based on energy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 60 (20), 7847-7859.Indirect radio-chemo-beta therapy: a targeted approach to increase biological efficiency of x-rays based on energy AbstractDespite the use of multimodal treatments incorporating surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, local control of gliomas remains a major challenge. The potential of a new treatment approach called indirect r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After approximately 15 doubling times, petri dishes were washed with PBS and adherent cell colonies fixed and stained with a 1:3 crystal violet:ethanol solution. Colonies (≥50 cells/colony) were manually counted and presented as Mean Plating Efficiency (MPE; [number of colonies]/[number of cells plated]*100) and Surviving Fraction (SF; MPE of treatment group/MPE of control group) as previously described 49 . Unirradiated control samples (with and without drugs) were handled under the same conditions as the irradiated samples.…”
Section: Short Tandem Repeat and Targeted Gene Sequencing Analysis Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After approximately 15 doubling times, petri dishes were washed with PBS and adherent cell colonies fixed and stained with a 1:3 crystal violet:ethanol solution. Colonies (≥50 cells/colony) were manually counted and presented as Mean Plating Efficiency (MPE; [number of colonies]/[number of cells plated]*100) and Surviving Fraction (SF; MPE of treatment group/MPE of control group) as previously described 49 . Unirradiated control samples (with and without drugs) were handled under the same conditions as the irradiated samples.…”
Section: Short Tandem Repeat and Targeted Gene Sequencing Analysis Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the plate area, colonies were identified as puncta that had a diameter from 0.5-5 mm (containing ≥50 cells, determined by translating average cell size into a colony size of 50 or more cells) (supplementary figure 1(c)) and identified colonies were automatically enumerated. Data are presented as mean PE (number of colonies/number of cells plated * 100) and surviving fraction (SF; PE of treatment group/ PE of control group) as previously described (Oktaria et al 2015). Unirradiated control samples (with and without nanoparticles/drugs) were handled under the same conditions as the irradiated samples.…”
Section: Automated Quantification For Clonogenic Survival Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the ability of a single cell to form colonies in vitro (Puck et al 1956). The method used in this study was derived from previous work (Oktaria et al 2015). Both the control and irradiated cells were plated immediately after the irradiation experiments.…”
Section: Clonogenic Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of the cell cycle distribution were performed by flow cytometric analysis using propidium iodide (PI) staining. The method used was derived from previous work (Oktaria et al 2015;Vine et al 2007). Cells (2.0 x 10 6 ) were centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min at 4C and washed twice with cold phosphate buffer solution (PBS) (Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ free) then fixed by drop wise addition of 1mL ice-cold ethanol (70%) and stored at -20C for up to 7 days before DNA analysis.…”
Section: Cell Cycle Analysis By Flow Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%