1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00256923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect radionuclide renocystography for determination of vesico-ureteral reflux in children

Abstract: Indirect radionuclide renocystography (IRRCG) is a method for the detection of vesico-ureteral reflux by analysis of the activity-time curves over the kidneys and bladder during voiding of urine about 30 min after intravenous administration of a radioactive indicator. This paper presents a new method for detection of reflux by a statistical test, the magnitude of the reflux is evaluated by the reflux volume per 1.73 m2 body surface area. Residual urine volume and urine voiding efficiency are also calculated. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, this series shows, like our own study, that IRC performed with MAG3 is generally unable to detect reflux not seen on MCUG. This was not the case in the publications dealing with DTPA [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, this series shows, like our own study, that IRC performed with MAG3 is generally unable to detect reflux not seen on MCUG. This was not the case in the publications dealing with DTPA [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These overall results are better than those produced in the present work. However, there is a wide variation in the published data, the percentage of false-negative cases on IRC varying from 22% to 51% [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]231.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the DRC may also be quantified (Willi & Treves, 1985). The DRC has a high sensitivity compared with the MCUG (Conway & Kruglik, 1976;Willi & Treves, 1985), as does the IRC (Handmaker et al, 1973;Pollet et al, 1981;Bower et al, 1985;Nielsen et al, 1985;Carlsen et al, 1986;Chapman et al, 1988). Few studies have been reported with poor results of the IRC (Majd, 1986).…”
Section: Imaging Controversymentioning
confidence: 93%