2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect regulation of heterotrophic peat soil respiration by water level via microbial community structure and temperature sensitivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
103
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
15
103
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, in this study the water table depth did not impact on the surface peat moisture content or affect the rate of heterotrophic respiration suggesting that the relationship between the water table depth and the microbial respiration was not constant along the whole soil profile or was prevalent to a certain depth only, as has previously been found in temperature and boreal wetlands (Chimner and Cooper 2003;Mäkiranta et al 2009). However, over long time-scales, a relationship between the water table depth and CO 2 emissions is more likely to be present ) and the short duration of this measurement campaign might have prevented the appearance of a clear pattern between the position of the water table and CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Environmental Controls Of Co 2 Emissionscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…In contrast, in this study the water table depth did not impact on the surface peat moisture content or affect the rate of heterotrophic respiration suggesting that the relationship between the water table depth and the microbial respiration was not constant along the whole soil profile or was prevalent to a certain depth only, as has previously been found in temperature and boreal wetlands (Chimner and Cooper 2003;Mäkiranta et al 2009). However, over long time-scales, a relationship between the water table depth and CO 2 emissions is more likely to be present ) and the short duration of this measurement campaign might have prevented the appearance of a clear pattern between the position of the water table and CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Environmental Controls Of Co 2 Emissionscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…1-8 %, Figure 6) was sufficient to stimulate soil respiration at a high rate, but as seen in Figure 6 the Majnegården soil suffered from hypoxia at 5 cm tension and the soil respiration was hampered. There was no significant difference in CO 2 emission between the 40 and 80 cm tension in the Majnegården soil in the incubation experiment and optimum conditions for soil respiration could maybe be achieved with a tension between 40 and 80 cm as in the studies of Mäkiranta et al (2009). Moisture was probably a limiting factor with tensions below 80 cm.…”
Section: Effect Of Water Table Regulation On Emission Ratesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Optimal conditions for soil respiration could probably be achieved with tensions lower than 40 cm water column since the soil was quite dry with higher tensions (air-filled pore space ≥23 %, Figure 6). The findings in the lysimeter study, with highest CO 2 emissions at the intermediate water Lafleur et al (2005) and Mäkiranta (2009). Berglund (1996) showed that plant growth was better at high water tables (40 cm compared to 60 and 70 cm) on peat soils with similar pore size distribution as Örke, but compacted peat soil types required deeper drainage in order to avoid aeration problems.…”
Section: Effect Of Water Table Regulation On Emission Ratesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This drawdown affects not only peatland structures, such as above and below ground communities Jaatinen et al 2007), but also ecosystem functions such as soil respiration, nutrient circulation and accumulation of peat and C (Braekke 1987;Martikainen et al 1995;Mäkiranta et al 2009;Kareksela et al 2014). As the average water table level could be re-established and maintained for 10 years, restoration of studied peatlands was successful in regaining the single most important condition needed for further recovery of ecosystem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%