2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect tool wear measurement and prediction using multi-sensor data fusion and neural network during machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of particle swarm and backpropagation techniques were demonstrated by Sun et al [21] for predicting the geometric deviation, and the authors claimed that machine learning is an effective approach as it predicts the output based on the available data and calculates better geometric deviation. SVR (support vector regression) is a common ML model that is used for predicting the life of the tool, specifically in a milling machine operation, and Bagga et al [22] demonstrated that a support vector machine (SVM) outperforms the MVR (multivariable regression) model, resulting in a decrease in downtime with proper predictive maintenance. The combination of different techniques, e.g., using a relatively smaller dataset of tool wear and applying time series methods to predict the previous data, was demonstrated by Kun et al [23].…”
Section: Background and Motivational Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of particle swarm and backpropagation techniques were demonstrated by Sun et al [21] for predicting the geometric deviation, and the authors claimed that machine learning is an effective approach as it predicts the output based on the available data and calculates better geometric deviation. SVR (support vector regression) is a common ML model that is used for predicting the life of the tool, specifically in a milling machine operation, and Bagga et al [22] demonstrated that a support vector machine (SVM) outperforms the MVR (multivariable regression) model, resulting in a decrease in downtime with proper predictive maintenance. The combination of different techniques, e.g., using a relatively smaller dataset of tool wear and applying time series methods to predict the previous data, was demonstrated by Kun et al [23].…”
Section: Background and Motivational Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These examples highlight the widespread application of information fusion technology in different fields to improve the accuracy and performance of tool monitoring and diagnosis and optimize the results of the decisions required to maintain tools. Bagga et al [ 11 ] proposed a multi-sensor data fusion method to measure and predict rear tool wear using various parameters, such as vibration, power, temperature, force, and surface roughness, and constructed an artificial neural network model for tool wear measurement and prediction. Wang et al [ 12 ] proposed a novel virtual tool wear sensing technology based on multi-sensor data fusion and artificial intelligence models, fusing multi-sensor data (such as force and vibration signals) with dimensionality reduction techniques and support vector regression models to infer tool wear parameters that are difficult to measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zhou et al [29] proposed an enhanced genetic algorithm-optimized Extreme Learning Machine for multi-sensor feature fusion. Bagga et al [30] proposed a new method based on multi-sensor data fusion for surface wear measurement and prediction, which achieved good results in the machining of AISI 4140 and provided an accurate tool wear prediction model for improving workpiece productivity and quality. He et al [31] fusion of temporal, frequency, and time-domain features from multiple sensor signals using a stacked network of sparse autoencoder networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%