2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual- and area-level unemployment influence smoking cessation among African Americans participating in a randomized clinical trial

Abstract: African Americans suffer disproportionately from the adverse health consequences of smoking, and also report substantially lower socioeconomic status than Whites and other racial/ethnic groups in the U.S. Although socioeconomic disadvantage is known to have a negative influence on smoking cessation rates and overall health, little is known about the influence of socioeconomic status on smoking cessation specifically among African Americans. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to characterize the impact … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
38
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the socioeconomic status and contrasted to a recent study targeting African American women (Kendzor et al, 2012), our findings reaffirm previous research that unemployment and deep povertyare significant predictors of continued smoking during the pregnancy. However, because of the difference in samples between the Kendzor et al (2012) study and ours, we can conclude that deep poverty among pregnant women was definitely not associated with greater odds of quitting for economic reasons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning the socioeconomic status and contrasted to a recent study targeting African American women (Kendzor et al, 2012), our findings reaffirm previous research that unemployment and deep povertyare significant predictors of continued smoking during the pregnancy. However, because of the difference in samples between the Kendzor et al (2012) study and ours, we can conclude that deep poverty among pregnant women was definitely not associated with greater odds of quitting for economic reasons.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, because of the difference in samples between the Kendzor et al (2012) study and ours, we can conclude that deep poverty among pregnant women was definitely not associated with greater odds of quitting for economic reasons.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…[21,22] Greater neighborhood unemployment and poverty were associated with reduced odds of smoking abstinence, while greater neighborhood education was associated with higher odds of abstinence. [26] Education independently reduces the odds of a manual class person smoking relative to a non-manual by 12%. [27] When compared to their individual effect, the present study highlights that together they greatly increase the risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glass and McAtee (2006) characterize the development of health actions or behaviors over the stream of time — potentially marked and influenced by turning points such as pregnancy and the transition to parenthood (Rutter, 1996) as well as individual age (Pickett & Pearl, 2001) — with social structures influencing the quality, direction, and intensity of health behaviors. Stressful economic conditions such as individual and area unemployment and poverty are fundamental mechanisms by which neighborhood contexts may influence smoking behavior (Kendzor et al, 2012; Lantz & Pritchard, 2010; Nkansah-Amankra, 2010; Schempf, Strobino, & O’Campo, 2009). Although maternal smoking during pregnancy moderates the effect of neighborhood variables on child outcomes (Nkansah-Amankra, 2010; Rich-Edwards, Buka, Brennan, & Earls, 2003), few neighborhood studies of pregnant women are designed to focus on maternal smoking behavior as a risk factor in their own health profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%