2000
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual and contextual characteristics of the German extreme Right–Wing vote in the 1990s. A test of complementary theories

Abstract: In this article we set out to improve our knowledge on voting for extreme right-wing parties, i.e. the Republikaner, by taking into account social, political and contextual characteristics. We test four theories that provide explanations as to why certain social categories are more likely to vote for the Republikaner. The hypotheses are tested with multilevel analyses, with data from a national sample (N = 4688). Multinomial analyses provide additional information on how theoretically derived political attitud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
118
1
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
118
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Lubbers and Scheepers (2000) studied the role of attitudinal dispositions in voting for the German antiimmigrant party the Republicans. They found that perceiving 'law and order' as important positively relates to voting for the Republicans.…”
Section: The Theoretical Foundation Of Anti-immigrant Party Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lubbers and Scheepers (2000) studied the role of attitudinal dispositions in voting for the German antiimmigrant party the Republicans. They found that perceiving 'law and order' as important positively relates to voting for the Republicans.…”
Section: The Theoretical Foundation Of Anti-immigrant Party Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only exception we are aware of is a study by Gerdes and Wadensjö (2008), examining potential causal e↵ects of asylum seekers from outside Europe and the OECD on voting in Denmark. 6 For studies on attitudes towards immigration see Card, Dustmann, and Preston (2012); Preston (2004, 2007); Facchini and Mayda (2009);Hainmueller andHiscox (2007, 2010); Krishnakumar and Müller (2012); O'Rourke and Sinnott (2006); Scheve and Slaughter (2001). For studies related to preferences for political parties, see Citrin, Green, Muste, and Wong (1997); Dülmer and Klein (2005); Knigge (1998);Lubbers and Scheepers (2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finalmente, en la literatura hay referencias a efectos del paro que no se pueden reducir a los modelos de castigo/recompensa o de voto orientado a políticas; por ejemplo, cuando se sostiene que los parados tienden a la radicalización ideológica y electoral (Kornhauser, 1960;Clark, 1985;De Witte, 1992) (Banks y Ullah, 1987;Gallie, 1993;Corbetta y Colloca, 2013) o están sobrerrepresentados en el electorado de algunos partidos de extrema derecha o ajenos al establisment (Lubbers y Scheepers, 2000Mughan et al, 2003). En definitiva, la investigación sobre voto económico no ha producido generalizaciones empíricas sólidas sobre la relación entre experiencia de desempleo y voto, sino tan solo hipótesis tentativas que poner a prueba en nuevos contextos.…”
Section: Antecedentesunclassified