2005
DOI: 10.3161/068.040.0110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual and Sexual Differences in the Calls of the Monomorphic White-Faced Whistling DuckDendrocygna viduata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all four species of whistling ducks, the non-overlapping values of call variables provided the possibility of error free sexing by a single loud whistle (Volodin et al 2009). As well as spontaneous vocal emission, playbacks of species-specific calls of whistling ducks evoked immediate vocal responses of loud whistles that revealed sex differences (Volodin et al 2005b).…”
Section: Order Anseriformesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all four species of whistling ducks, the non-overlapping values of call variables provided the possibility of error free sexing by a single loud whistle (Volodin et al 2009). As well as spontaneous vocal emission, playbacks of species-specific calls of whistling ducks evoked immediate vocal responses of loud whistles that revealed sex differences (Volodin et al 2005b).…”
Section: Order Anseriformesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another intriguing problem is which acoustic parameters could be responsible for the finer details of the information content of dog barks. Based on the vast literature of vocalization-based sex and individual recognition in other species, e.g., African wild dog, Lycaon pictus (Hartwig 2005); white-faced whistling duck, Dendrocygna viduata (Volodin et al 2005); or Wied's black-tufted-ear marmosets, Callithrix kuhlii (Smith et al 2009), one might expect dog barks to also carry specific cues of the caller's individual features, such as sex and age, for example. There are, however, considerable obstacles in testing such subtle pieces of information using classical techniques (i.e., playback).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from mammals, whose sexual recognition is mostly by olfactory stimuli, birds detect sex and identity of conspecifics regularly by visual and acoustical performances. In most species, male calls are lower in frequency than female calls (VOLODIN et al, 2005). For this reason, using the parameter F1 or F2 could be useful in differ the sex, as it was found in the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It might identify unusual traits related to animals' status (MANTEUFFEL & SCHÖN, 2004;CORDEIRO et al, 2009;GRANDIN, 2010;CHAN et al, 2011). Other studies show vocal signals as a prominent tool to identify the animals' sex (FISCHER et al, 2004;VOLODIN et al, 2005;VANNONI & MCELLIGOTT, 2008). Broiler sexing is a time-consuming task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation