Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace 2010
DOI: 10.1201/ebk1439804896-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Antecedents of Bullying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…People with a weak SOC are indeed expected to possess poorer coping abilities and a less resistant personality (Nel et al, 2004), which would lead them to be particularly prone to become targets of workplace bulling when they perceive adverse psychosocial working conditions. In this study we found that having a lower SOC was connected per se to a higher probability of reporting both work-related and person-related bullying, which aligns with studies observing that personal dimensions play a significant role in the occurrence of workplace bullying (Bowling et al, 2010;Zapf and Einarsen, 2011). However, the fact that SOC did not exert a practically relevant moderating effect suggests that perceiving a poor psychosocial work environment A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 24 (according to the JDC model) may relate to being a target of workplace bullying irrespective of inter-individual differences, at least in terms of SOC.…”
Section: The Jdc Model and Workplace Bullyingsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…People with a weak SOC are indeed expected to possess poorer coping abilities and a less resistant personality (Nel et al, 2004), which would lead them to be particularly prone to become targets of workplace bulling when they perceive adverse psychosocial working conditions. In this study we found that having a lower SOC was connected per se to a higher probability of reporting both work-related and person-related bullying, which aligns with studies observing that personal dimensions play a significant role in the occurrence of workplace bullying (Bowling et al, 2010;Zapf and Einarsen, 2011). However, the fact that SOC did not exert a practically relevant moderating effect suggests that perceiving a poor psychosocial work environment A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 24 (according to the JDC model) may relate to being a target of workplace bullying irrespective of inter-individual differences, at least in terms of SOC.…”
Section: The Jdc Model and Workplace Bullyingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Coyne et al, 2000;Glasø et al, 2007). However, inconsistent results have been obtained in other studies about the role played by personality traits such as extraversion, conscientiousness and openness for experience in the probability of being exposed to workplace bullying (see Zapf and Einarsen, 2011 for a review).…”
Section: The Role Of Sense Of Coherence (Soc) In the Relationship Betmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Alternatively or additionally, social anxiety-both fear of negative evaluation and proclivity toward social avoidance-may genuinely be associated with unfair treatment at the hands of others that legitimately evokes mistrust. Indeed, the experience of peer victimization has been linked to social anxiety in youths (Storch et al, 2003) and adults (Zapf et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, age, sexuality, ethnic origin, or a handicap have been found to be motives for bullying in the context of higher education (Ringrose & Renold, 2010). Typical individual factors which often serve as causes of bullying include protection of one's self-worth, envy, narcissistic personality disorder, aggression, lack of social skills and weak emotional control (Zapf & Einarsen, 2010).…”
Section: University As a Context Of Bullyingmentioning
confidence: 99%