2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-016-1192-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual behavioral and neurochemical markers of unadapted decision-making processes in healthy inbred mice

Abstract: One of the hallmarks of decision-making processes is the inter-individual variability between healthy subjects. These behavioral patterns could constitute risk factors for the development of psychiatric disorders. Therefore, finding predictive markers of safe or risky decision-making is an important challenge for psychiatry research. We set up a mouse gambling task (MGT)—adapted from the human Iowa gambling task with uncertain contingencies between response and outcome that furthermore enables the emergence of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
74
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(97 reference statements)
5
74
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present findings provide further support of a role for vitamin D in serotonin synthesis and metabolism in the developing brain. Furthermore, decreased cortical serotonergic function has been associated with impaired cognitive flexibility in adult mice (Pittaras et al, 2016) and increase impulsivity in humans (Campus et al, 2016). Serotonergic cell bodies, located in the raphe nuclei of the brainstem, primarily project to the frontal cortex and striatum (Chung et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present findings provide further support of a role for vitamin D in serotonin synthesis and metabolism in the developing brain. Furthermore, decreased cortical serotonergic function has been associated with impaired cognitive flexibility in adult mice (Pittaras et al, 2016) and increase impulsivity in humans (Campus et al, 2016). Serotonergic cell bodies, located in the raphe nuclei of the brainstem, primarily project to the frontal cortex and striatum (Chung et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, nonoperant‐based tasks have been developed and used in rats and mice, which measure choice behavior with a multiarm maze . In one version of this paradigm called the mouse gambling task, each arm of the maze offers an immediate smaller reward (one or two sugar pellets) and then a subsequent larger reward (three to five sugar pellets) or an equivalent “nonreward,” which was nonpalatable quinine pellets, with probabilities ranging from 0.05 to 0.9 …”
Section: Animal Models Of Gdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 In one version of this paradigm called the mouse gambling task, each arm of the maze offers an immediate smaller reward (one or two sugar pellets) and then a subsequent larger reward (three to five sugar pellets) or an equivalent "nonreward," which was nonpalatable quinine pellets, with probabilities ranging from 0.05 to 0.9. 53 This latter mouse paradigm is interesting because it includes the receipt of nonpalatable pellets instead of the absence of the reward plus a time-out, which is given in the rGT and mIGT. However, in some cases, rats are excluded if they consume the nonpalatable quinine pellets, limiting the benefit of this additional nonreward.…”
Section: Animal Models Of Gdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data illustrate a behavioral continuum with overlap in choice strategies between human physiological and pathological conditions. Interestingly, animal versions of the IGT have been developed, with species appropriate adjustments, to assess DM in a design comparable to humans [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] . For example, in rodent gambling tasks the decks of cards have been replaced by mazes or operant chambers suited with different options of varying outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to human studies, lesioned rodents perform suboptimally in adapted IGT versions, as well as they show delayed DM compared to healthy individuals 18,19 . For the majority of healthy rodents, an improvement of performances is observed as the task progresses and individuals commonly cluster in three subpopulations reflecting variable choice strategies 12,14,20 . Good DM individuals quickly develop a strong preference for the advantageous options, while poor DM individuals display the worst performances, either not showing any preference for neither advantageous nor disadvantageous options, or displaying a long-term preference for the disadvantageous ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%