2021
DOI: 10.1177/10464964211041114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Competencies for Self-Managing Team Performance: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract: Self-managing teams are popular but they can only benefit team performance if their members are competent to navigate within self-managing systems. Based on a systematic literature search on self-managing, self-directing, and self-leading teams, we reviewed 84 studies related to KSAOs and traits in self-managing teams. Grounded on existing models of team effectiveness and individual KSAOs, we integrated all findings into one KSAO model and showed the relations of single KSAOs with team performance. The results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
(341 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, with regards to the study of teamwork competencies, this research provides a unique perspective by using an assessment of team competencies based on a situational judgment test considered more objective than more widely used self-reported metrics of prior studies (O'Neill et al, 2013;Steven and Campion, 1999), which are subject to social desirability bias (Weber and Funke, 2012). The positive association between teamwork KSAs and performance in entrepreneurial student teams found in this study is consistent with prior studies of work teams in field settings (Leach et al, 2005;Stevens et al, 2002;Stevens and Campion, 1999) and in the context of self-managing teams (Doblinger, 2022;Hirschfeld et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, with regards to the study of teamwork competencies, this research provides a unique perspective by using an assessment of team competencies based on a situational judgment test considered more objective than more widely used self-reported metrics of prior studies (O'Neill et al, 2013;Steven and Campion, 1999), which are subject to social desirability bias (Weber and Funke, 2012). The positive association between teamwork KSAs and performance in entrepreneurial student teams found in this study is consistent with prior studies of work teams in field settings (Leach et al, 2005;Stevens et al, 2002;Stevens and Campion, 1999) and in the context of self-managing teams (Doblinger, 2022;Hirschfeld et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…, 2005; Stevens et al. , 2002; Stevens and Campion, 1999) and in the context of self-managing teams (Doblinger, 2022; Hirschfeld et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to past research, metadata from the O*NET database were used to develop quantitative assessment scales, information technology, and algorithms, such as the prediction and construction of an evaluation system, to conduct research on teachers' professional competencies [2,[13][14][15]. This research used social network analysis (SNA) methods, approaches, and theoretical concepts, such as affiliation networks and bipartite graphs [16] that included occupational titles, Element Name and ID, and KSAOs [17] from the O*NET database, to design and implement CB-TPD curricula, as shown in Figure 1. In addition, ECPC keyword co-occurrences were analyzed by centrality metrics to construct e-learning curricula evaluation metrics for CB-TPD and verify their importance [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these organizations exhibited exceptional information transparency that enabled every employee to make the best decisions in the interest of the whole organization (Martela, 2019). SMOs often relied on self‐managing teams which were responsible for specific issues, highly autonomous in their decisions, and highly self‐managing (Doblinger, 2021; Hackman, 1986). Traditional organizations with centralized decision authority (hereafter non‐SMOs) differed in those organizational core principles; for instance, task identification and distribution occurred in top‐down processes; supervisors allocated compensation and rewards and monitored and controlled work outputs; and broad information distribution was needless due to precise instructions and strict task boundaries (Martela, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%