2019
DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual condition, but not fledging phenology, carries over to affect post‐fledging survival in a Neotropical migratory songbird

Abstract: Migratory animals face severe time and energy constraints during their annual cycle. These constraints may be exacerbated in young animals by conditions experienced during development that can affect both phenotype and phenology. For young migratory songbirds, the period between fledging and autumn migration, the post‐fledging period, is believed to represent a time of intense selective pressure. However, there has yet to be a study that has assessed post‐fledging survival for the entirety of the post‐fledging… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lifetime perspective developed here has allowed us to extend the scope of fitness consequences beyond single breeding seasons, and the lay‐date effects we have seen on offspring recruitment and lifetime number fledged mirror those detected in another well‐studied swallow (Saino et al 2012, Raja‐Aho et al 2017, cf. Evans et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lifetime perspective developed here has allowed us to extend the scope of fitness consequences beyond single breeding seasons, and the lay‐date effects we have seen on offspring recruitment and lifetime number fledged mirror those detected in another well‐studied swallow (Saino et al 2012, Raja‐Aho et al 2017, cf. Evans et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such challenges could include enduring harsh early‐season environmental conditions such as inclement weather (e.g., Ramos et al 2002), low food availability (e.g., Young 1994, Bowlin and Winkler 2004), high levels of predation (e.g., Borgmann et al 2013), or competition for scarce nesting sites or mates (e.g., Smith 2006). Several studies of timing of breeding have explored the connection between quality and date experimentally (reviewed in Verhulst and Nilsson 2008) or by examining facets of fitness beyond reproduction (Brinkof et al 2002, Brown et al 2015, Low et al 2015, Needham et al 2017, Evans et al 2019). However, in the latter cases, breeding adults have usually been followed only to the season just after the focal breeding attempt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preservation of aquatic systems will support not only riparian specialists such as Bank Swallows but also other insectivorous songbirds using the same riparian habitat ( Blancher and McNicol, 1991 ; Brown et al , 2002 ; Deschênes et al , 2003 ; Twining et al , 2018a ; Jackson et al , 2020 ) and similar forested riparian habitats ( Gray, 1993 ; Rottenborn, 1999 ; Lussier et al , 2006 ; Pennington et al , 2008 ; Rubin et al , 2019 ). Understanding foraging ranges of Bank Swallows from inland and lakeshore sites using radiotelemetry (see Evans et al , 2020 ) will also help evaluate costs and benefits of using natural versus aggregate pits in this species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few other investigators have examined how individual condition influences fledgling survival. Even within nests, the condition or age of individual nestlings can vary due to asynchronous hatching or differential feeding rates (Evans et al 2020). Conditions experienced in the nest likely have carryover effects during the post‐fledging period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%