Progress in Caries Prevention
DOI: 10.1159/000402436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Diagnosis, Prognosis and Counselling for Caries Prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
16

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
62
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The resting fl ow rate is considered to be low at ^ 0.1 ml/min and the stimulated fl ow rate at ^ 0.7 ml/min [Ericsson and Hardwick, 1978]. The fl ow rates of subjects in this study were far lower than the standard; some of them at some sampling times during the study even had no measurable volume of saliva.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The resting fl ow rate is considered to be low at ^ 0.1 ml/min and the stimulated fl ow rate at ^ 0.7 ml/min [Ericsson and Hardwick, 1978]. The fl ow rates of subjects in this study were far lower than the standard; some of them at some sampling times during the study even had no measurable volume of saliva.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Specifically, the clinical hallmark of hyposalivation for stimulated saliva has been described as an SFR less than 0.70 mL/min (9,25,26). However, salivary hypofunction is difficult to assess, and the establishment of standard values has been impaired, mainly because IQR, interquartile range; delta MSVP, difference for maximum systolic velocity at external carotid artery; delta PIP, difference for pulsatility index at external carotid artery; delta RIP, difference for resistive index at external carotid artery; delta FVP, difference for flow volume at external carotid artery; delta MSVS, difference for maximum systolic velocity at facial artery; delta PIS, difference for pulsatility index at facial artery; delta RIS, difference for resistive index at facial artery; delta FVS, difference flow volume at facial artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming this trend continues for up to 1 minute, the amount of saliva secretion during chewing for 1 minute reaches about 1.2 ml, which is less than the 1.4-1.8 ml/min secreted during chewing of paraffin wax. 20,21 This is probably because paraffin wax with no moisture content requires more saliva during chewing than gummy jelly with moisture content of about 40%. However, the reason for a relatively greater amount of saliva secretion during chewing for 10 seconds than with other chewing times is thought to be because, in addition to stimulation of oral sensation due to chewing, gummy jelly provides greater gustatory stimulus than other chewing times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%