2007
DOI: 10.1177/0146167206298568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Differences in Analytic Versus Holistic Thinking

Abstract: The authors constructed the Analysis-Holism Scale (AHS) to measure analytic versus holistic thinking tendency. In Study 1, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, a 24-item scale was developed. In Study 2, convergent and discriminant validities were tested. In Studies 3 and 4, the known-group difference validity was examined by comparing scores on the AHS of Americans and Koreans (Study 3) and of Korean students of Oriental medicine and Korean students of non-Oriental medicine majors (Study 4). Res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
558
0
11

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 443 publications
(586 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(53 reference statements)
17
558
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…A summary of our eight-sample study is displayed in Table 1. In order to assess experiencing tensions and paradox mindset, we generated items deductively (Hinkin, 1995) from reviewing paradox theory (Lewis, 2000;Smith & Lewis, 2011;Smith, 2014) as well as related scales (e.g., Choi, Koo, & Choi, 2007;Kruglanski, Webster, & Klem, 1993;Spencer-Rodgers, Srivastava, & Peng, 2001). Table 1 about here ---------------------------------Although existing constructs and scales share similar themes, none of them directly assess the experience of tensions and the propensity for having a paradox mindset.…”
Section: Study 1 Item Generation Exploratory Factor Analysis and Itementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A summary of our eight-sample study is displayed in Table 1. In order to assess experiencing tensions and paradox mindset, we generated items deductively (Hinkin, 1995) from reviewing paradox theory (Lewis, 2000;Smith & Lewis, 2011;Smith, 2014) as well as related scales (e.g., Choi, Koo, & Choi, 2007;Kruglanski, Webster, & Klem, 1993;Spencer-Rodgers, Srivastava, & Peng, 2001). Table 1 about here ---------------------------------Although existing constructs and scales share similar themes, none of them directly assess the experience of tensions and the propensity for having a paradox mindset.…”
Section: Study 1 Item Generation Exploratory Factor Analysis and Itementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, individuals may cognitively differentiate and integrate different perspectives but feel uncomfortable when the perspectives appear to be contradictory. Finally, research on naïve dialecticism, building on insights from Eastern philosophy, addresses individual attitudes towards contradictions (Choi et al, 2007;Spencer-Rodgers, Williams, & Peng, 2010), but not whether individuals accept and feel comfortable with contradictions. Similarly, the attitude towards contradictions subdimension of holism focuses on tactics for managing tensions, such as compromising and seeking middleground (Choi et al, 2007), rather than confronting and embracing tensions.…”
Section: Study 1 Item Generation Exploratory Factor Analysis and Itementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, dialecticism, which emphasizes the operation of opposing forces of yin and yang, is very pervasive and strongly upheld in East Asian cultures (Ji et al, 2001;Peng & Nisbett, 1999). More generally, worldviews are more holistic in Asia than in North America (Choi, Koo, & Choi, 2007;Markus & Kitayama, 1991;Nisbett, Peng, Choi, & Norenzayan, 2001). If the holistic view of happiness in Japan, in which people accept both positive and negative features as a part of happiness, is reflective of their holistic worldviews, people with such world views should be more likely to agree that negative features, such as transcendental reappraisal, are part of the meaning of happiness.…”
Section: Current Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%