1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00428.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Differences in Attitude‐Behavior Consistency: The Prediction of Contraceptive Behavior

Abstract: A model of individual differences that moderate attitude‐behavior consistency was developed and tested in the context of predicting use consistency of the diaphragm. Variables hypothesized to moderate the attitude‐behavior relationship included reactions to major life changes, the attitudes and opinions of others, sexual interest, locus of control, and the perceived susceptibility to pregnancy. Attitudes were conceptualized in terms of a Relative Contraceptive Utility (RCU), which was defined as the difference… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies on minority populations are underpowered to detect moderation effects and the present study is no exception. Several researchers have identified the difficulty detecting moderation in nonexperimental settings (e.g., field studies; Jaccard, Helbig, Wan, Gutman, & Kritz-Silverstein, 1990; Morris, Sherman, & Mansfield, 1986). Compared to experiments, field studies have a much more difficult time detecting moderation because their variables tend to have non-normal distributions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on minority populations are underpowered to detect moderation effects and the present study is no exception. Several researchers have identified the difficulty detecting moderation in nonexperimental settings (e.g., field studies; Jaccard, Helbig, Wan, Gutman, & Kritz-Silverstein, 1990; Morris, Sherman, & Mansfield, 1986). Compared to experiments, field studies have a much more difficult time detecting moderation because their variables tend to have non-normal distributions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the items have been consistently uncorrelated with social desirability (e.g., Jaccard et al, 1990). To maximize truthful responding, we used the following procedures: First, teens were guaranteed confidentiality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second limitation is that the magnitude of the interactions observed was quite modest, as indicated by Figures 4 and 6. However, the difficulty of detecting interaction effects in general, and in nonexperimental field studies in particular, has been well documented in the literature (e.g., Brockner, 1988;Evans, 1985;Jaccard, Helbig, Wan, Gutman, & Kritz-Silverstein, 1990;McClelland & Judd, 1993;Morris, Sherman, & Mansfield, 1986;Zedeck, 1971). According to two reviews (Champoux & Peters, 1987;Chaplin, 1991), survey studies that have detected moderation effects tend to have modest effect sizes similar to ours.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%