2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in computational psychiatry: A review of current challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our methodology may therefore be useful in dissociating common co-occurring processes, especially if the orthogonality must be established post-hoc or used as a complement to specific task designs, such as cases involving working memory and attention (56), valuation and salience (57), or valence, arousal, and emotions (49). In computational psychiatry, our approach may aid in constructing neural biomarkers specific to a particular diagnosis without relying on covariates of no interest (58,59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our methodology may therefore be useful in dissociating common co-occurring processes, especially if the orthogonality must be established post-hoc or used as a complement to specific task designs, such as cases involving working memory and attention (56), valuation and salience (57), or valence, arousal, and emotions (49). In computational psychiatry, our approach may aid in constructing neural biomarkers specific to a particular diagnosis without relying on covariates of no interest (58,59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, these findings were found across females and males, indicating comparable developmental patterns and similar decision-making impairments in attention problems regardless of sex. While computational psychiatry still has limited direct clinical implications (Hauser et al, 2019 ; Karvelis et al, 2023 ), it is a promising avenue for improving our understanding of cognition in psychopathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the widespread use of computational phenotypes, their interpretation hinges critically on their psychometric properties 19 , which remain poorly understood 20 . This issue is even more prominent in longitudinal studies that address changes within individuals over time 21 , 22 .…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies explicitly address the reliability of computational phenotypes (see review in ref. 20 ) and rarely in more than two sessions (but see ref. 23 ).…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%