Individual Differences in Diagnostic Judgments of Psychosis and Neurosis from the MMPI

Wiggins, Nancy

doi:10.1177/001316447103100116

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Evidence for this presumption is found in Kohen's (1971) individual difference analysis (Tucker & Messick, 1963) of the present data: a factor analysis of the 98 judges yielded two orthogonal subject factors, both of which were moderately correlated with validity. In contrast to this result, a factor analysis of the 29 Meehl judges used by Goldberg (1970) yielded a single validity factor of judges (Wiggins, 1971). A condition favoring more than one type of valid judge would be one which involved a number of uncorrelated but valid cues.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Man versus model of man revisited: The forecasting of graduate school success.

Wiggins¹,

Kolen²

1971

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ninety-eight psychology graduate students were asked to forecast first-yeargraduate grade point averages based on 110 profiles containing 10 cues derived from their fellow students' records. For each subject, the cue values were regressed onto the subjects' judgments (the model of man). Results indicated that the models (predicted judgments) were more accurate than the subjects' own judgments when correlated with the actual criterion. The average judgments for each profile were considerably more valid than the average of the judges' individual validities. Even the average judgments were improved upon by modeling. It was recommended that the model of man substitute for man in forecasting graduate grade point averages.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Man versus model of man revisited: The forecasting of graduate school success.

Wiggins¹,

Kolen²

1971

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…May be reproduced with no cost by students and faculty for academic use. Non-academic reproduction requires payment of royalties through the Copyright Clearance Center, http://www.copyright.com/ (Goldberg & Jones, 1969 Differentiation was also negatively related to two CPI scales developed by Hase and Goldberg (1967) to measure Need for Achievement (nAc) and Sociability (Soc) Posavac, 1971;Shikiar, Fishbein, & Wiggins, 1974;Wiggins, 1971;Wiggins, Hoffman, & Taber, 1969). Recently, both types of studies have been reviewed by Wiggins (1973), who concluded with a plea for future research on the &dquo;basic parameters of individual differences in human judgment: the reliability, internal consistency, and transituational generality of such individual differences&dquo; (p. 137).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Stylistic Components of Human Judgment: The Generality of Individual Differences

Ramanaiah¹,

Goldberg²

1974

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stylistic Components of Human Judgment: The Generality of Individual Differences

Ramanaiah

Goldberg

1977

Applied Psychological Measurement

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In an effort to discover the generality of individual differences in judgmental processes, 12 potential styles were assessed from the predictions made by 86 judges across two or four replications of each of four judgmental tasks. The analyses focused on the internal consistency (across replica tions, within occasions), temporal stability (across occasions, within tasks), and intertask congruence of each of the judgmental variables. The findings suggested that five variables—linear predictability, judgmental consistency, subjective complexity, dif ferentiation, and confidence—have sufficiem generality to assume the provisional status of judg mental styles. Highly significant relationships were found, for male though not for female judges, be tween each of the provisional styles and a number of personological and demographic variables, in cluding scales from the MMPI, CPI, EPPS, and SVIB.

show abstract

Individual Differences in Diagnostic Judgments of Psychosis and Neurosis from the MMPI

Cited by 3 publications

References 23 publications

Man versus model of man revisited: The forecasting of graduate school success.

Man versus model of man revisited: The forecasting of graduate school success.

Stylistic Components of Human Judgment: The Generality of Individual Differences

Stylistic Components of Human Judgment: The Generality of Individual Differences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About