2023
DOI: 10.31730/osf.io/cmb7x
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Differences in Leveraging Regularity in Emergent L2 Readers in Rural Côte d’Ivoire

Abstract: Purpose: Statistical learning (SL) approaches to reading maintain that proficient reading requires assimilation of the rich statistical regularities in the writing system. Reading skills in developing first- and second-language readers in English have been shown to be predicted by individual differences in sensitivity to statistical regularities in orthography and semantics, with good readers relying more on orthographic consistency, and less on semantic associations. However, the study of SL and its relation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We specifically avoided using a picture‐based vocabulary task, as images can often be strongly culturally‐bound and therefore inappropriate for rural Ivorian context. Notably, all in‐person measures were previously implemented in Côte d'Ivoire to assess the language and literacy skills of children in this age range (see Akpé et al, 2021; Ball et al, 2022; Brice et al, 2023; Jasińska, Akpe, et al, 2022; Jasińska, Zinszer, et al, 2022; Whitehead et al, 2023; Zinszer et al, 2023a, 2023b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We specifically avoided using a picture‐based vocabulary task, as images can often be strongly culturally‐bound and therefore inappropriate for rural Ivorian context. Notably, all in‐person measures were previously implemented in Côte d'Ivoire to assess the language and literacy skills of children in this age range (see Akpé et al, 2021; Ball et al, 2022; Brice et al, 2023; Jasińska, Akpe, et al, 2022; Jasińska, Zinszer, et al, 2022; Whitehead et al, 2023; Zinszer et al, 2023a, 2023b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%