1991
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(91)90308-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
123
3
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
14
123
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a negative correlation between locomotor response to saline injection and initial locomotor response to AMPH, in contrast to earlier reports of a positive correlation between heightened locomotor response to novelty and increased locomotor response to AMPH and cocaine in some (Piazza et al, 1989;Hooks et al, 1991Hooks et al, , 1992 but not all (Djano and Martin-Iverson, 2000) studies. Differences in experimental details (eg measurement of response to novelty vs our measure, response to saline injection in a novel environment) might account for the differing observations.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Findingscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed a negative correlation between locomotor response to saline injection and initial locomotor response to AMPH, in contrast to earlier reports of a positive correlation between heightened locomotor response to novelty and increased locomotor response to AMPH and cocaine in some (Piazza et al, 1989;Hooks et al, 1991Hooks et al, , 1992 but not all (Djano and Martin-Iverson, 2000) studies. Differences in experimental details (eg measurement of response to novelty vs our measure, response to saline injection in a novel environment) might account for the differing observations.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Findingscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…A relation between locomotor response to novelty and subsequent locomotor response to AMPH and cocaine has previously been described by several (Piazza et al, 1989;Hooks et al, 1991Hooks et al, , 1992, but not all investigators (Djano and Martin-Iverson, 2000). Because locomotor response to novelty might potentially influence locomotor response to saline injection, one of the measures contributing to our defined PD 128907 locomotor inhibition, the correlation between AMPH-stimulated locomotion, and responses to PD 128907 and saline (Table 3, days 12-14) were also evaluated individually.…”
Section: Behavioral Response To Amphetamine and To D3 Receptor Agonismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, rats with high novelty-induced locomotor activity (high responders, HR) acquired i.v. amphetamine (Hooks et al, 1991a;Piazza et al, 1989Piazza et al, , 1990 and cocaine (Hooks et al 1991b;Mantsch et al, 2001;Piazza et al, 1998) self-administration more readily than low responders (LR), showing a potential connection between intake of sweetened substances and drugs, the HR rats also consumed greater amounts of sucrose than LR rats (Cools and Gingras, 1998). The elevated response to novelty and corresponding vulnerability to drug self-administration in rats has been suggested to be analogous to high sensation-seeking behaviors in humans (Dellu et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These individual differences have been observed both in outbred and inbred strains of mice (Ruth et al, 1988;George and Ritz, 1990;Henricks et al, 1997;Marley et al, 1998;Rocha et al, 1998). Likewise, variability in COC-induced behaviors has been observed in rats, predominantly in the propensity of rats, often initially classified as either low or high responders to novelty, to self-administer drug (Glick et al, 1994;Piazza et al, 2000), or to become behaviorally sensitized (Hooks et al, 1991a;Hooks et al, 1992;Djano and Martin-Iverson, 2000;Chefer et al, 2003). Differences in initial responsiveness of humans to cocaine also reflect both genetic and environmental influences and are one factor that determines whether or not an individual will become addicted to cocaine (Haertzen et al, 1983;Davidson et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%