2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in nonverbal prediction and vocabulary size in infancy

Abstract: Children who generate and update verbal predictions have larger vocabularies, suggesting that prediction may be a mechanism that supports language learning. We hypothesize that this relation is not confined to the domain of language, but instead signals a broader individual difference in information processing. To investigate this possibility, we tested infants (n = 50) in the early stages of vocabulary development (12-24 months) on their ability to generate and update nonverbal, visual predictions. In an eye-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because their memory representations are fragile [4345], consistency might be particularly helpful in building memory representations that can be carried from one learning moment to the next. Moreover, previous research suggests a positive link between developmental outcomes and the ability to make predictions [17, 18, 41], as well as the amount of predictability and stability present in young children’s home environments [4649]. Our results suggest that these links may be due, in part, to the benefits of the predictability of input for learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Because their memory representations are fragile [4345], consistency might be particularly helpful in building memory representations that can be carried from one learning moment to the next. Moreover, previous research suggests a positive link between developmental outcomes and the ability to make predictions [17, 18, 41], as well as the amount of predictability and stability present in young children’s home environments [4649]. Our results suggest that these links may be due, in part, to the benefits of the predictability of input for learning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Evidence from monolinguals suggests that infants are more efficient in processing familiar words following a common sentence frame (e.g., Look at the…) than when hearing words in isolation, as predictable frames afford listeners the opportunity to anticipate upcoming information (Fernald & Hurtado, 2006). Across many dimensions, predictability supports infants' word learning (e.g., Axelsson & Horst, 2014;Benitez & Smith, 2012), and prediction abilities are tied to vocabulary knowledge (Reuter, Emberson, Romberg, & Lew-Williams, 2018). On Switched-Language trials, it was presumably harder for toddlers to generate an accurate prediction about the upcoming label.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from monolinguals suggests that infants are more efficient in processing familiar words following a common sentence frame (e.g., Look at the…) than when hearing words in isolation, as predictable frames afford listeners the opportunity to anticipate upcoming information (Fernald & Hurtado, 2006). Across many dimensions, predictability supports infants' word learning (e.g., Axelsson & Horst, 2014;Benitez & Smith, 2012), and prediction abilities are tied to vocabulary knowledge (Reuter et al, 2018). On Switched-Language trials, it was presumably harder for toddlers to generate an accurate prediction about the upcoming label.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%