1996
DOI: 10.1006/jhev.1996.0060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in object manipulation in a colony of tufted capuchins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
1
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Capuchin natural history might well underlie their strong responsiveness to the provision of simple, inanimate toys and foraging boxes and the extent of their abnormal behavior without such stimuli. The extreme manipulative proclivities and abilities of capuchins observed in the wild [Janson & Boinski, 1992;Fragaszy & Boinski, 1995] are also apparent in captivity [Fragaszy & Adams-Curtis, 1991;Byrne & Suomi, 1996]. Perhaps capuchins are more likely to exploit and more reliant upon the presence of relatively low-stimulus manipulative opportunities compared to many other primate taxa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Capuchin natural history might well underlie their strong responsiveness to the provision of simple, inanimate toys and foraging boxes and the extent of their abnormal behavior without such stimuli. The extreme manipulative proclivities and abilities of capuchins observed in the wild [Janson & Boinski, 1992;Fragaszy & Boinski, 1995] are also apparent in captivity [Fragaszy & Adams-Curtis, 1991;Byrne & Suomi, 1996]. Perhaps capuchins are more likely to exploit and more reliant upon the presence of relatively low-stimulus manipulative opportunities compared to many other primate taxa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Capuchins exhibit a great variety of behaviours to explore and act on the environment especially while foraging (Fragaszy et al 2004;Perry and Manson 2008;Terborgh 1983). Both wild and captive capuchins spontaneously perform objectobject and object-surface combinations (Byrne and Suomi 1996;Fragaszy and Adams-Curtis 1991;Fragaszy and Boinski 1995;Panger 1998;Visalberghi 1988), tool use (Ottoni and Mannu 2001;Visalberghi and Fragaszy 2013), and gather information about tool affordances in the absence of extrinsic rewards (Manrique et al 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infants and juveniles who are closer to some group members, and are better tolerated by them, may have more opportunities to observe new behaviors and learn new skills. Proximity to adult males may, in particular, lead to increased opportunities, as they often have preferential access to food or novel objects [Byrne & Suomi, 1996;DiBitetti & Janson, 2001;Janson, 1984;Visalberghi, 1988]. Facial inspection to adult males in this study became more frequent (at least for male infants) and more consistent late in the first year; this is a time when weaning may begin for some infants, and their foraging demands may increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%