Individual Differences in Preference for Solitude

Burger, Jerry M.

doi:10.1006/jrpe.1995.1005

Cited by 281 publications

(379 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

318

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In this context, we can list the following factors that are potentially between network position and level of satisfaction with social relationships: the need to belong (Leary, Kelly, Cottrell and Schreindorfer, 2013;Pickett, 2004), preference for loneliness (Burger, 1995), sensitivity to rejection (London, Downey, Bonica and Paltin, 2007), personality features (Teppers et al, 2013), self-esteem (Çivitci and Çivitci, 2009), conviction of one's own effectiveness (Wei, Russell and Zakalik, 2005) or even genetic factors . Any of these could be the reason for a different assessment of analogous peer relationships.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The dynamics of perception of social integration in primary school. The latent growth curve model

Grygiel¹

2017

Edukacja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article discusses the specific character of changes in the assessment of the sense of social integration in the classroom between primary school third-and sixth-graders, and their social, demographic and cognitive determinants, with special consideration given to a pupil's position in the sociometric network. The analysis of latent growth curves -based on a scalar longitudinal measurement invariance, the bifactor model of the Perceived Peer Integration Questionnaire (PPI) and three rounds of the nationwide study School determinants of educational effectiveness (N = 4349) -indicates that the second stage of learning in primary school is characterised by a more negative perception of peer integration in classroom settings, which cannot be explained by socio--demographic variables nor the relationships taking place within peer networks. This indicates that it may be linked to developmental changes rather than to the actual deterioration of peer relations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The dynamics of perception of social integration in primary school. The latent growth curve model

Grygiel¹

2017

Edukacja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The team orientation scale was positively related to the Likeability scale from the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI; Hogan, 1986), the Group Productivities subscale of the Cooperativeness Scale (Lu & Argyle, 1991), the Cooperative Interdependence subscale from the Social Interdependence Scale (Johnson & Norem-Hebeisen, 1979), and a measure of Collectivism (Wagner, 1995). Moreover, team orientation was negatively related to Preference for Solitude (Burger, 1995). Such findings suggest that team-oriented individuals are predisposed to be affiliative without being overly dominant toward team members.…”

Section: The Role Of Dominance and Affiliation In Team Orientationmentioning

confidence: 96%

Development of a Conditional Reasoning Measure of Team Orientation

O’Shea¹,

Driskell²,

Goodwin³

et al. 2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Thus, they should be less lonely than introverts (see review by Heinrich & Gullone, 2006). In light of these arguments, correlations larger than .50 reported in several studies are not surprising (Burger, 1995;Lasgaard, 2007;Lasgaard & Elklit, 2009).…”

mentioning

confidence: 94%

More on testing for validity instead of looking for it

Antonakis

Dietz

2011

Personality and Individual Differences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In press: Personality and Individual Differences 2 More on Testing for Validity Instead of Looking for ItUsing Monte Carlo simulations and reanalyzing the data of a validation study of the AEIM emotional intelligence test, we demonstrated that an atheoretical approach and the use of weak statistical procedures can result in biased validity estimates. These procedures included stepwise regressionand the general case of failing to include important theoretical controls-extreme scores analysis, and ignoring heteroscedasticity as well as measurement error. The authors of the AEIM test responded by offering more complete information about their analyses, allowing us to further examine the perils of ignoring theory and correct statistical procedures. In this paper we show with extended analyses that the AEIM test is invalid.

show abstract

Individual Differences in Preference for Solitude

Cited by 281 publications

References 0 publications

The dynamics of perception of social integration in primary school. The latent growth curve model

The dynamics of perception of social integration in primary school. The latent growth curve model

Development of a Conditional Reasoning Measure of Team Orientation

More on testing for validity instead of looking for it

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About