2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00034-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in rational and intuitive thinking styles as predictors of heuristic responses and framing effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
139
3
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
139
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The most widely this problem is presented in psychology and psycho physiology [7,42,44,45,46]. Classic conceptions of individuality either reduce temper to different features of lower level of individuality or define temper as coming from higher planes of individuality -plane of personality.…”
Section: Table 1 Results Of Regression Analysis Of "Positive" Scores'mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most widely this problem is presented in psychology and psycho physiology [7,42,44,45,46]. Classic conceptions of individuality either reduce temper to different features of lower level of individuality or define temper as coming from higher planes of individuality -plane of personality.…”
Section: Table 1 Results Of Regression Analysis Of "Positive" Scores'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In European scientific tradition, which originated from antique time, there exist different theories of individuality [41,43,45,46,48], the most wide spread of which are: theory of tempers, individual distinctions by type of thinking, perception of information and so on [13,39,40,42,44,47].…”
Section: Purpose Tasks Of the Work Materials And Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were grouped into four categories according to their combination of thinking styles, with high or low levels of both styles or with one prevailing style and compared in the discussed indicators. This classification of participants was inspired by some previous studies, where group membership was a result of a median split (Shiloh, Salton, & Sharabi, 2002) or a cluster analysis (Wolfradt et al, 1999) and where this membership had an effect on the studied variables that was not identified by the bivariate associations.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The REI-40 has been found to be reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.74-0.91) and consistent. 8,10,[14][15][16] It involves 40 questions that are scored on a five-point Likert scale from "Definitely False" to "Definitely True." Twenty of these questions assess each thinking style (rational or experiential), of which 10 assess favourability towards a style and 10 assess ability to use a style.…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%