2017
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in EEG correlates of recognition memory due to DAT polymorphisms

Abstract: IntroductionAlthough previous research suggests that genetic variation in dopaminergic genes may affect recognition memory, the role dopamine transporter expression may have on the behavioral and EEG correlates of recognition memory has not been well established.ObjectivesThe study aims to reveal how individual differences in dopaminergic functioning due to genetic variations in the dopamine transporter gene influences behavioral and EEG correlates of recognition memory.MethodsFifty‐eight participants performe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(174 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose that LPC amplitude measures using stimulus-locked ERPs are susceptible to sources of variance (and potentially bias) depending on the RT distributions for hits and correct rejections. For example, if RTs are faster for hits compared to correct rejections, as observed in behavioural (Ratcliff & Murdock, 1976; Wilding et al, 1996) and EEG studies (Glaser et al, 2012; Medrano et al, 2017; Rubin et al, 1999; Yu et al, 2022) as well as our own data, the LPC will peak earlier relative to stimulus onset for hits. This would produce apparent stimulus-locked amplitude differences that are partly due to shifts in ERP component latency (rather than amplitude).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We propose that LPC amplitude measures using stimulus-locked ERPs are susceptible to sources of variance (and potentially bias) depending on the RT distributions for hits and correct rejections. For example, if RTs are faster for hits compared to correct rejections, as observed in behavioural (Ratcliff & Murdock, 1976; Wilding et al, 1996) and EEG studies (Glaser et al, 2012; Medrano et al, 2017; Rubin et al, 1999; Yu et al, 2022) as well as our own data, the LPC will peak earlier relative to stimulus onset for hits. This would produce apparent stimulus-locked amplitude differences that are partly due to shifts in ERP component latency (rather than amplitude).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Spatiotemporal regions of interest (ROIs) were defined according to previous research showing event-related potential (ERP) and theta oscillatory effects during source memory retrieval (Nyhus and Badre, 2015; Ross et al, 2015, 2018; Medrano et al, 2017). The ROIs were left parietal and right frontal channel groups (see Figures 2C, 3C, 4C); mean theta (4–8 Hz) power from 1000 to 1500 ms was computed by averaging the channels within each region for each condition/subject.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants for the study were recruited from the University of Colorado Boulder community. Data from these same participants examining how the 5HTTLPR serotonin transporter polymorphism affects ERP’s and how dopamine transporter polymorphisms affect ERP’s and oscillatory power during recognition memory has been reported elsewhere (Ross et al, 2015 ; Medrano et al, 2017 ). Participants were given monetary compensation for their participation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%