2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Differences in Social Media Use for Information Seeking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
94
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
94
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are not unanimous, but many studies suggest that women use libraries and SNSs more frequently than men (Onwuegbuzie, Jiao, & Bostick, 2004;Sin, 2012). In contrast, men seem to use Wikipedia and Internet forums more frequently (Kim, Sin, & Tsai, 2014a;Lim & Kwon, 2010). In terms of study level, underclassmen and master's students were found to report higher levels of difficulty in finding everyday information (Sin & Kim, 2014).…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The results are not unanimous, but many studies suggest that women use libraries and SNSs more frequently than men (Onwuegbuzie, Jiao, & Bostick, 2004;Sin, 2012). In contrast, men seem to use Wikipedia and Internet forums more frequently (Kim, Sin, & Tsai, 2014a;Lim & Kwon, 2010). In terms of study level, underclassmen and master's students were found to report higher levels of difficulty in finding everyday information (Sin & Kim, 2014).…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The author conducted multiple analyses of the survey responses, using inferential statistics (Kim, Sin, & Tsai, 2014). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-tests were used to examine any possible significant relationships between respondents' information literacy experiences and their feelings of academic integration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have sought to identify the factors that contribute to individual differences in social media use. Prior studies have shed light on factors such as users' demographics (e.g., Kim, Sin & Tsai, 2014;Kimbrough, Guadagno, Muscanell & Dill, 2013), personalities (e.g., Blackwell, Leaman, Tramposch, Osborne & Liss, 2017;Correa, Hinsley & de Zúñiga, 2010), motivations (e.g., Lee & Ma, 2012;Oh & Syn, 2015) and system design features (e.g., McCay-Peet & Quan-Haase, 2016;Schlesinger et al, 2017). While many focused on different types of platforms (e.g., social networking sites, microblogs) or specific sites (e.g., Facebook, Twitter), little effort has been made to examine social media at a more granular level, such as particular features of social media (e.g., social feedback features such as number of likes) that individuals find useful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%