2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in the attentional blink: Evidence from the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in non-blinkers and blinkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, research on attentional bias has informed developments of attentional retraining procedures to be used in variety of emotional disorders (e.g., Amir et al, 2009; Amir, Weber, Beard, Bomyea, & Taylor, 2008; Koster, Fox, & MacLeod, 2009; Najmi & Amir, 2010), although evidence for the effectiveness is not unequivocal and rewarding attention shifts may have a larger influence on dysfunctional attentional biases (Sigurjónsdóttir, Björnsson, Ludvigsdóttir, & Kristjánsson, 2015). There is evidence to suggest that the attentional blink task is sensitive to mood (e.g., Rokke, Arnell, Koch, & Andrews, 2002; Trippe, Hewig, Heydel, Hecht, & Miltner, 2007) and personality variables (e.g., Wang et al, 2016). Given the present results, together with recent findings (Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigurðardóttir, et al, 2015; Sigurjónsdóttir et al, 2019), future studies should explore the possible utility of the (emotional) AB for measuring anxiety-related changes following attention bias modification interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, research on attentional bias has informed developments of attentional retraining procedures to be used in variety of emotional disorders (e.g., Amir et al, 2009; Amir, Weber, Beard, Bomyea, & Taylor, 2008; Koster, Fox, & MacLeod, 2009; Najmi & Amir, 2010), although evidence for the effectiveness is not unequivocal and rewarding attention shifts may have a larger influence on dysfunctional attentional biases (Sigurjónsdóttir, Björnsson, Ludvigsdóttir, & Kristjánsson, 2015). There is evidence to suggest that the attentional blink task is sensitive to mood (e.g., Rokke, Arnell, Koch, & Andrews, 2002; Trippe, Hewig, Heydel, Hecht, & Miltner, 2007) and personality variables (e.g., Wang et al, 2016). Given the present results, together with recent findings (Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigurðardóttir, et al, 2015; Sigurjónsdóttir et al, 2019), future studies should explore the possible utility of the (emotional) AB for measuring anxiety-related changes following attention bias modification interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…如, 注意瞬脱者在枕颞区和小脑区的ALFF显著高于非 注意瞬脱者, 而非注意瞬脱者在额顶区的ALFF显著高 于注意瞬脱者, 说明注意瞬脱者更易被分心物干扰, 从 而降低了对目标刺激的注意控制 [26] .…”
Section: 近年来研究者开始较多关注大脑自发神经活动在认知 加工中的作用unclassified
“…The regional amplitude of LFFs (ALFF) has shown to be a reliable measure of intrinsic spontaneous brain fluctuations (Zang et al, ; Zuo et al, ). As a data‐driven approach, it has been widely used to investigate the neural correlates of individual differences in behavioral performance in several cognitive domains, including object conceptual processing (Wei et al, ), spoken‐language learning (Deng, Chandrasekaran, Wang, & Wong, ), working memory (Zou et al, ), and attention (L. Wang et al, ). Furthermore, resting‐state functional connectivity (RSFC) examining inter‐regional synchronization of spontaneous LFFs is another promising approach in neuroimaging studies (Biswal et al, ; Fox et al, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%