1994
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.20.4.402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in vulnerability to inescapable shock in rats.

Abstract: The present study determined whether individual differences in neophobia during an open-field pretest predict vulnerability to inescapable electric shock, as measured by 2 tests of learned helplessness in rats. Shuttle-escape latencies and saccharin finickiness increased across groups that had received increasing numbers of inescapable shocks 24 hr earlier. Dispersion in the test measure as well as the percentage of variance explained by pretest neophobia were greater when no or few shocks were delivered in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the low anxiety trait in combination with the low exploration trait provided resilience against developing stress-induced depression-like behaviors. Importantly, behavioral responses in tests for anxiety (Stiller et al, 2011), exploration (Minor et al, 1994;Walker et al, 2008) and stress coping (Drugan et al, 1989) in rats had been previously shown to predict the development of certain stress-induced depressive-like and/or conditioned fear behaviors. In addition, individual differences in novelty reactivity -generally termed ''novelty-seeking'' trait -in rats were found to be associated with the emergence of anxiety-and depression-like behaviors following repeated exposure to social defeat (Duclot et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the low anxiety trait in combination with the low exploration trait provided resilience against developing stress-induced depression-like behaviors. Importantly, behavioral responses in tests for anxiety (Stiller et al, 2011), exploration (Minor et al, 1994;Walker et al, 2008) and stress coping (Drugan et al, 1989) in rats had been previously shown to predict the development of certain stress-induced depressive-like and/or conditioned fear behaviors. In addition, individual differences in novelty reactivity -generally termed ''novelty-seeking'' trait -in rats were found to be associated with the emergence of anxiety-and depression-like behaviors following repeated exposure to social defeat (Duclot et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 1 day following the social interaction test, the rats were tested in the emergence test as described previously (McGregor et al, 2003a;Minor et al, 1994). The apparatus consisted of a black wooden rectangular arena (96 Â 100 Â 40 cm 3 ) with a black wooden hide box (24 Â 40 Â 15 cm 3 ) placed in the top right corner of the arena.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, exposure to inescapable shock (IS) but not equal amounts and durations of escapable shock (ES) leads to later failure to learn to escape shocks in a different situation (Maier and Seligman, 1976). Other behavioral outcomes resulting from exposure to IS but not ES include an exaggeration of fear conditioning to a context (Maier et al, 1995), increases in neophobia (Minor et al, 1994), and reductions in social interaction (Short and Maier, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%