2009
DOI: 10.1108/10610420910998217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual effects of product quality signals in the presence versus absence of other signals: differential effects across brick‐and‐mortar and online settings

Abstract: Individual effects of product quality signals in the presence versus absence of other signals: differential effects across brick-and-mortar and online settings Dipayan (Dip) Biswas Sujay Dutta Abhijit (Abe) Biswas Article information:To cite this document: Dipayan (Dip) Biswas Sujay Dutta Abhijit (Abe) Biswas, (2009),"Individual effects of product quality signals in the presence versus absence of other signals: differential effects across brick#and#mortar and online settings"If you would like to write for this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined effect of multiple signals has been explained in different ways. Biswas, Dutta, and Biswas (2009) argued for an enhancement effect in which the perceived strength of a focal signal becomes stronger in the presence of another signal. However, a different view suggests that multiple signals, especially when intended to signal the same underlying quality attributes, tend to create a dilution effect because of information redundancy (Benedicktus, Brady, Darke, & Voorhees, 2010; Pollock, Chen, Jackson, & Hambrick, 2010).…”
Section: Study 1 Signaling Effects Of E-crm Quality: Evidence From Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined effect of multiple signals has been explained in different ways. Biswas, Dutta, and Biswas (2009) argued for an enhancement effect in which the perceived strength of a focal signal becomes stronger in the presence of another signal. However, a different view suggests that multiple signals, especially when intended to signal the same underlying quality attributes, tend to create a dilution effect because of information redundancy (Benedicktus, Brady, Darke, & Voorhees, 2010; Pollock, Chen, Jackson, & Hambrick, 2010).…”
Section: Study 1 Signaling Effects Of E-crm Quality: Evidence From Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table II summarizes the extant literature on e-commerce signaling. Most early signaling studies examine how each of these signals influences consumers' perceptions of product quality (Biswas et al, 2009;Gregg and Walczak, 2008), risks (Alicia and Esther, 2011;Biswas and Biswas, 2004), trust (Alicia and Esther, 2011;Arnold et al, 2007;Bolton et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2004), and purchase intention (Gregg and Walczak, 2008;Wells et al, 2011). Only a few recent studies have considered the effect of signals on sellers' actual sales performance (Amblee and Bui, 2011;Bockstedt and Goh, 2011;Li et al, 2009;Ou and Chan, 2014).…”
Section: The Role Of Signals In the E-marketplacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signaling theory provides a framework for studying conditions of information asymmetry (Akerlof 1970). Customers use cues (i.e., signals) to make more accurate assessments of quality when faced with limited information about a product (Akerlof 1970; Biswas, Dutta, and Biswas 2009; Shen, Chiou, and Kuo 2011). If they have incomplete information (i.e., lack intrinsic cues), they make inferences based on extrinsic cues that are readily available and easy to evaluate (Wells, Valacich, and Hess 2011; Zeithaml, Varadarajan, and Zeithaml 1988).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%