Individual innovativeness, self-efficacy and e-learning readiness of students of Yenagoa study centre, National Open University of Nigeria

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore the role individual innovativeness along with e-learning self-efficacy play in predicting the e-learning readiness of first- and second-year students of an open and distance education institutions in an African context.Design/methodology/approachTherefore, building on previous related research in this area, a quantitative approach was adopted to address the research questions and to establish whether a statistically significant relationship existed between individual innovativeness, e-learning self-efficacy, the independent variables; and e-learning readiness, the dependent variable. In total, 476 first- and second-years students of the university participated in the four-Likert-type scale survey. The research instrument which comprises 74 survey items was completed by 217 of the students. Statistical tools used for analysing data included both Pearson Product Moment Correlation coefficients and t-tests.FindingsIt was discovered that a strong positive and significant relationship was observed between individual innovativeness and e-learning readiness of first- and second-year students of the Yenagoa Study Centre of the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN); a statistically significant relationship was also found between e-learning self-efficacy scores and the e-learning readiness of the first- and second-year students of the Yenagoa Study Centre of NOUN; there was a statistically significant joint relationship between the three variables under investigation; findings equally revealed that male respondents had higher e-learning readiness than their female counterparts.Research limitations/implicationsLike every other study of this nature, this one also suffers some limitations. First, NOUN is a very large university with over half a million students spread across almost 78 study centres. This means that observation from just one study centre amounts to a very small sample size. This according to Schweighofer, Weitlaner, Ebner and Rothe (2019) jeopardises the generalisability and validity of study results. The authors also maintain that empirical data generated from surveys that usually rely participants' abilities to read and select responses without further interpretation by the researchers suffer from cognitive biases like social desirability. To address the above limitations, detailed studies involving all studies centres of NOUN be undertaken and other qualitative and or mixed research methodologies be adopted in the future.Practical implicationsThe implications for this study are that people who are innately innovative will willingly accept technology and by extension, learning in technology-rich environments like those found in like NOUN whose mode of study is blended learning inherently found in open and distance learning (ODL) institution. Therefore, this study is significant as it will provide relevant information to the management and administrators of NOUN, policymakers and regulatory institutions for the development, deployment and implementation of e-learning strategies. Findings will also benefit e-learning initiatives undertaken by similar institutions that adopt the ODL mode of education in Nigeria and other developing countries.Originality/valueEven though, studies on the antecedents of e-learning readiness have been widely conducted across diverse contexts, studies exploring the associations between individual innovativeness, e-learning self-efficacy and e-learning readiness are relatively hard to come by. The above two variables as predicting the e-learning readiness in the study context are comparatively new. This study thus focuses on the relationships between the individual innovativeness levels, e-learning self-efficacy beliefs of students and their e-learning readiness which ultimately determines their ability to sustain studies in an ODL institution.

Students' readiness for e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in a South-East Asian university: a Rasch analysis

“…By reviewing the literature, students' readiness for e-learning can be categorised into five main factors: (1) technology skills, (2) technology usage, (3) technology availability, (4) self-directed learning, as well as (5) computer and Internet efficacy. Based on these categories of e-learning, examining e-learning readiness in terms of students' varied characteristics has received more attention during the recent years (Adams et al , 2018; Adams et al , 2020; Bubou and Job, 2020). Furthermore, differences of students' demographic factors such as gender, age, ethnicity, field of study and level of study vary across individual components of e-learning readiness (Adams et al , 2018).…”

Academics' attitudes towards online education amidst the Covid-19 outbreak

“…The measurements for most of the constructs were developed based on the literature, and newly developed measures were evaluated at a few brainstorming sessions by the research team, followed by an expert review of selected university academics. All in all, 46 items were used to measure the research constructs primarily developed based on related literature (Salloum et al, 2019;Bubou and Job, 2020;Singh et al, 2020).…”

“…, 2021), student attitudes towards distance learning (Ismaili, 2021), students' acceptance of e-learning (Salloum et al. , 2019), e-learning readiness (Bubou and Job, 2020), student-instruction communication (Alawamleh et al. , 2022), online class preparedness and student performance (Francescucci et al.…”

“…Many studies have been undertaken to discuss the context of online education from the students' perspectives, such as the adaptation intention of students for an online class (Maheshwari, 2021), students' perspective of e-learning participation (Nikou and Maslov, 2021), student perception and performance (Adam and Nel, 2009), student' satisfaction with e-learning (Al-hawari and Mouakket, 2010;Al-Samarraie et al, 2018), student engagement (Basbeth et al, 2021), student attitudes towards distance learning (Ismaili, 2021), students' acceptance of e-learning (Salloum et al, 2019), e-learning readiness (Bubou and Job, 2020), student-instruction communication (Alawamleh et al, 2022), online class preparedness and student performance (Francescucci et al, 2021). Conversely, very few investigations (Basaran and Yalman, 2020;Paliwal and Singh, 2021) have been carried out to examine the teachers' perspectives regarding online teaching, particularly during the Covid-19 outbreak trying to continue the debate and fill the literature gap.…”

E-Learning Success Model in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic in Higher Educational Institutions

“…ELR is broadly defined as “The preparedness of the students to fully explore and exploit the learning opportunities provided by ICT and its related learning technologies, and, ultimately, to maximally draw the attendant benefits in terms of students’ academic achievements, reduced dropout rates, social connectivism and for lifelong learning” [ 59 ]. Simply, ELR is “those factors that must be accomplished before EL implementation can be regarded as being successful” [ 60 ].…”