2004
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mui013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual-Level Factors and Organizational Performance in Government Organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
408
1
23

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 467 publications
(461 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
29
408
1
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Brewer and Selden (1998) find evidence of intrinsic motivation amongst whistleblowers, although their sample comprises only public sector employees, thus not allowing for a direct comparison with private sector employees. Other studies supporting the presence of intrinsic motivation among public sector employees include Lyons, Duxbury, and Higgins (2006), Dilulio (1994), Kim (2005), Houston (2000), and Feeney (2008. On the other hand, a number of studies have also shown that public and private sector employees assign equal values to intrinsic rewards and earnings or other extrinsic rewards (e.g., Lyons, Duxbury, and Higgins 2006;Maidani 1991).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Brewer and Selden (1998) find evidence of intrinsic motivation amongst whistleblowers, although their sample comprises only public sector employees, thus not allowing for a direct comparison with private sector employees. Other studies supporting the presence of intrinsic motivation among public sector employees include Lyons, Duxbury, and Higgins (2006), Dilulio (1994), Kim (2005), Houston (2000), and Feeney (2008. On the other hand, a number of studies have also shown that public and private sector employees assign equal values to intrinsic rewards and earnings or other extrinsic rewards (e.g., Lyons, Duxbury, and Higgins 2006;Maidani 1991).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, Cho & Ringquist (2011) find that levels of 'trustworthiness of managerial leadership' are strongly and positively associated with a variety of organisational outcomes, including employee satisfaction. The findings of these and other studies (Kim, 2005), have potential implications for how one explains the impact of TMT heterogeneity. If, as suggested above, TMT heterogeneity helps to engender greater trust and a more open organisational climate, it is reasonable to assume that heterogeneity will have (positive) consequences for employee satisfaction (Raes et al, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…These relationships are also noted in the specific literature on organisational climate. Indeed, as Kuenzi & Schminke (2009) Taking this reasoning a step further, it can be argued -as studies investigating the impact of employee satisfaction on organisational performance have shown (Cho & Ringquist, 2011;Kim, 2005) -that more satisfied employees will be more engaged and willing to implement TMT decisions. Consequently, it seems reasonable to assume that levels of employee satisfaction are both an outcome of TMT heterogeneity and a decisive factor in explaining why TMT heterogeneity is frequently associated with higher performance.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there was lack of motivation among faculty for their own higher education as stated by the principal, CON. It is significant for employee satisfaction and efficient organizational performance [4]. In addition, it was also observed that the college has ineffective maintenance of the college building as the white wash was not done on the walls and window glasses were broken.…”
Section: Constraints Along With Their Reasons and Possible Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%