2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual metering and debiting (IMD) in Sweden: A qualitative long-term follow-up study of householders’ water-use routines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, empirical evidence from the existing literature shows that it is possible for consumers to save resources and money by adopting smart meters (e.g., Darby, 2006;Alahmad et al, 2012;Vassileva et al, 2012;Gans et al, 2013;Davies et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2017;Mogles et al, 2017;Liu, Mukheibir, 2018;Montginoul and Vestier, 2018;Wemyss et al, 2019). The savings realized depend on several factors including the utility monitored (Sønderlund et al, 2016), the duration of monitoring (e.g., Köhler, 2017), as well as sociodemographic and cultural characteristics of the household's members (e. g., Ehrhardt-Martinez et al, 2010;Martinsson et al, 2011). However, several studies have questioned whether consumers experience difficulty in maintaining resource reduction in the long run (Ehrhardt-Martinez et al, 2010;Alahmad et al 2012;Schultz et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2017;Wemyss et al, 2019).…”
Section: Potential Savingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, empirical evidence from the existing literature shows that it is possible for consumers to save resources and money by adopting smart meters (e.g., Darby, 2006;Alahmad et al, 2012;Vassileva et al, 2012;Gans et al, 2013;Davies et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2017;Mogles et al, 2017;Liu, Mukheibir, 2018;Montginoul and Vestier, 2018;Wemyss et al, 2019). The savings realized depend on several factors including the utility monitored (Sønderlund et al, 2016), the duration of monitoring (e.g., Köhler, 2017), as well as sociodemographic and cultural characteristics of the household's members (e. g., Ehrhardt-Martinez et al, 2010;Martinsson et al, 2011). However, several studies have questioned whether consumers experience difficulty in maintaining resource reduction in the long run (Ehrhardt-Martinez et al, 2010;Alahmad et al 2012;Schultz et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2017;Wemyss et al, 2019).…”
Section: Potential Savingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[68,71,73] found that the effect of a financial incentive diminishes over time. Also, dynamic pricing seems to have a persistent effect [74] while a one-time price increase does not [37]. In the same vein, strong social norms can lead to a maintained decrease in drinking water consumption per household [63,75], while a weaker social norm message or social comparison does not always lead to a maintained change in behavior [68,75].…”
Section: Maintained Behavioral Changementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The most frequently used determinants of persistent consumption are behavioral control and contextual determinants. Even though the price elasticity of drinking water and energy usage is debated [35][36][37][38], the behavioral control that comes with household income is found to be significantly correlated with higher usage in the long term in several studies [39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. This might also be due to little efficiency behavior by occupying bigger dwellings [43,[45][46][47] and owning and using more energy-using devices [39,45,46,48].…”
Section: Persistent Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential for reduced energy use through behavioural change has been estimated at 10-25% [83]. Regarding energy use for domestic hot water, individualisation of metering and billing has shown promising yet varying results [84]; however, it has also been found that low-income households experience significant cost increases from this measure as household size, i.e., the number of residents in the household that use hot water for e.g., showering, tends to be greater among low-income earners [85]. More so, increased time at home due to e.g., unemployment or illness will further increase water use among the worst-off [85].…”
Section: More Energy-efficient Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%