Individual Patient-reported Activity Levels Before and After Joint Arthroplasty Are Neither Accurate nor Reproducible

Abstract

Background Patients often are asked to report walking distances before joint arthroplasty and when discussing their results after surgery, but little evidence demonstrates whether patient responses accurately represent their activity. Questions/purposes Are patients accurate in reporting distance walked, when compared with distance measured by an accelerometer, within a 50% margin of error? Methods Patients undergoing THA or TKA were recruited over a 16-month period. One hundred twenty-one patients were screened and 66 patients (55%) were enrolled. There were no differences in mean age (p = 0.68), proportion of hips versus knees (p = 0.95), or sex (p = 0.16) between screened and enrolled patients. Each patient wore a FitBitTM Zip accelerometer for 1 week and was blinded to its measurements. The patients reported their perceived walking distance in miles daily. Data were collected preoperatively and 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively. Responses were normalized against the accelerometer distances and Wilcoxon one-tailed signed-rank testing was performed to compare the mean patient error with a 50% margin of error, our primary endpoint. Results We found that patients’ self-reported walking distances were not accurate. The mean error of reporting was > 50% both preoperatively (p = 0.002) and postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean magnitude of error was 69% (SD 58%) preoperatively and 93% (SD 86%) postoperatively and increased with time (p = 0.001). Conclusions Patients’ estimates of daily walking distances differed substantially from those patients’ walking distances as recorded by an accelerometer, the accuracy of which has been validated in treadmill tests. Providers should exercise caution when interpreting patient-reported activity levels. Level of Evidence Level III, diagnostic study.

The Influence of Obesity on Hip Pain, Function, and Satisfaction 10 Years Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

“…Busato et al [4] in a large, multicenter registry study found a lower proportion of obese patients reporting an ability to walk unsupported for more than 1 hour at 12 years. Similar trends were identified by Roder et al [42]; however, inherent limitations exist in these subjectively reported measures, as arthroplasty patient estimates of activity levels generally are not accurate within a 50% margin of error [46]. Mobility disability is observed more often in obese populations [4] and presents as a likely confounder when gauging the relative success of THA in nonobese and obese patients.…”

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Use after Total Knee Arthroplasty Improves Early Return to Function: A Randomized Trial

“…Physical function tests measure a patient's ability to perform activities of daily living and are specifically designed to measure what a patient truly can do rather than what they believe they can do. 18 A core set of five performance-based tests were determined by Osteoarthritis Research Society International as being the most relevant to patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis and/or joint replacements, and included the TUG and stair climb tests. 7 In our study, statistically significant improvements were observed in TUG tests in patients treated with NMES at both 6-and 12-weekpostoperative (►Table 5).…”

Five years’ trajectories of functionality and pain in patients after hip or knee replacement and association with long-term patient survival

“…However, currently there is no good evidence to support the association between joint replacement and increased physical activity. Patient self-reported physical activity seems neither accurate nor reproducible as assessed in a group of patients pre-operatively and 6-8 weeks post-operatively 31 . A study conducted with sensor-based measurements in 63 patients awaiting hip or knee arthroplasty from Australia showed no change to measurements 6 months later 32 , also 6 months measurements may still be influenced by post-operative pain and complications.…”