2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-004-0884-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual recognition of neighbors by song in a suboscine bird, the alder flycatcher Empidonax alnorum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In birds, vocal communication is very important in territorial interactions (Catchpole and Slater 2008). Changes in the number of trills and whistles (Sprau et al 2010), number of calls and songs (Lovell and Lein 2005;Hyman less aggressive motivation of the sender. The broadcast call of the Corncrake is simple because there is no repertoire variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In birds, vocal communication is very important in territorial interactions (Catchpole and Slater 2008). Changes in the number of trills and whistles (Sprau et al 2010), number of calls and songs (Lovell and Lein 2005;Hyman less aggressive motivation of the sender. The broadcast call of the Corncrake is simple because there is no repertoire variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also good evidence for vocal recognition of neighbours, especially in birds (e.g. McComb et al 1993;Lambrechts & Dhondt 1995;Lovell & Lein 2005). However, most studies have been conducted with species where the group size and number of neighbours are small and stable over time (Falls 1982;Lambrechts & Dhondt 1995;Stoddard 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, solitary kangaroo rats (Dipodomys ingens) accept neighboring individuals as mates (Lovell and Lein 2005;Ralls 1971;Randall et al 2002). Neighbor recognition has been seen both within and between species, and in some species neighboring groups contain closely related animals (Barash 1974;Ralls et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%