Radiotracer techniques were used to quantify the assimilation and subsequent efflux of silver, cadmium, iron, mercury, thallium, and zinc by mesozooplankton fed ciliates, heterotrophic dinoflagellates, or heterotrophic flagellates, and the results were compared with published values measured for phytoplankton prey. The subcellular distribution of the metals within the prey cells was also determined and related to their bioavailability. Marine copepods assimilated 59-82% of Ag, 83-92% of Cd, 32-66% of Fe, 14-49% of Hg, and 71-78% of Zn ingested with protozoan prey. Higher Ag, Cd, Fe, and Hg assimilation efficiencies were observed for at least one of the species of protozoa than reported in the literature for phytoplankton. Significant differences in assimilation were not observed for Zn or for Tl fed to freshwater Ceriodaphnia in either protozoa or phytoplankton. The higher assimilation efficiencies of protozoan metals, when observed, were matched by higher fractions of metals in the cytoplasm of protozoa. A biokinetic model used to calculate steady-state metal concentrations in copepods indicates that copepods may contain 119% more Ag and 44% more Zn when feeding on ciliates instead of diatoms, possibly resulting in sublethal toxic effects at Ag and Zn concentrations reported for the Hudson River estuary. Further, higher assimilation and efflux rates of protozoan Fe may enhance remineralization of this limiting nutrient by mesozooplankton in high nutrient, low chlorophyll regions.Aquatic animals can accumulate metals both directly from their aqueous environment and from the prey they ingest, but metals accumulated through these two routes can have different physiological effects and geochemical fates. Food is often the dominant uptake pathway for metals in crustacean zooplankton (Munger and Hare 1997;Wang and Fisher 1998), and zooplankton can be more sensitive to metals accumulated through this pathway (Hook and Fisher 2001a,b). In addition to having greater physiological effects, metals that are ingested and assimilated by zooplankton can build up in food chains or be biologically recycled; these metals generally display longer residence times in surface waters than unassimilated metals, which get packaged into fecal pellets and sink out of surface waters (Fowler and Knauer 1986;Fisher et al. 1991). Metals bound to the exoskeleton may also be exported with molts (Fowler 1977).Most studies that have examined the assimilation of metals by zooplankton grazers have focused on phytoplankton prey (e.g., Sick and Baptist 1979;Fisher et al. 1991;Wang et al. 1996), but heterotrophic protists can also serve as an important food source for mesozooplankton. As the dominant grazers of heterotrophic and autotrophic picoplankton in many aquatic systems (Sherr and Sherr 1994), protozoa are an important trophic link between the microbial loop and the metazoan food web (Stoecker and Capuzzo 1990). Mi-