2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual snag detection using neighborhood attribute filtered airborne lidar data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows that plots with different mortality ratios have different lidar intensity distributions. The importance of lidar intensity for the identification of dead trees has often been studied in forests where dead trees are abundant, such as in high mortality sites [9][10][11][12]38]. This study confirms that the lidar intensity can discriminate well interspersed dead trees in low mortality sites (mortality ratio <10.5%) where, for example, only natural mortality is observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 3 shows that plots with different mortality ratios have different lidar intensity distributions. The importance of lidar intensity for the identification of dead trees has often been studied in forests where dead trees are abundant, such as in high mortality sites [9][10][11][12]38]. This study confirms that the lidar intensity can discriminate well interspersed dead trees in low mortality sites (mortality ratio <10.5%) where, for example, only natural mortality is observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Lidar intensity can, therefore, be used as a classifier of the status (live or dead) of trees. Kim et al [10] and Wing et al [12] found similar results on mixed conifer forests. Figure 3 shows that plots with different mortality ratios have different lidar intensity distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At present, many scholars has carry on the research of laser point cloud filtering and classification method, according to the different mode of scanning, filtering algorithm are divided for airborne laser scanning filtering (ALS) algorithm, mobile laser scanning(MLS) filtering algorithm and terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) filtering algorithm.The filtering algorithm of ALS contains multiresolution hierarchical classification (MHC) algorithm (Chuanfa Chen et al, 2013),Progressive TIN densification (PTD) algorithm (Jixian Zhang and Xiangguo Lin, 2013),intensity and density statistics algorithm( Brian M. Wing et al, 2015),Multi-directional Ground Filtering (MGF) algorithm (Xuelian Meng et al, 2009), Parameter-free ground filtering algorithm(Domen Mongus and Borut Žalik, 2012) and so on; The filtering(classification) algorithm of MLS contains regular voxelization of the space(C. Cabo et al, 2014), combine intensity textures and local geometry (Luca Penasa et al, 2014), shape-based segmentation method(Bisheng Yang and Zhen Dong, 2013) and so on; The filtering(classification) algorithm of TLS contains analysis of the 3D geometric texture methods(Ahlem Othmani et al, 2013;Yi Lin et al, 2016), super-voxels and multi-scale conditional random fields (Ee Hui Lim et al, 2009) and so on. In general, different filtering algorithms are proposed for different sources of laser scanning and obtained good results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%