2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rccl.2019.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual trends in LDL-C control in patients with previous myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with these results, Ribas et al reported that just 45% of ACS patients reached LDL levels <70 mg/dL in the 122 days after the ACS, and that the use of Masana's recommendations improved the management and treatment planification in these patients ( 11 ). In addition, Ródenas et al observed that only one third of patients who had suffered a previous myocardial infarction had LDL levels <70 mg/dL during a follow-up period between 2013 and 2018 ( 32 ). These analyses considered a relatively small population of patients, but it is expected that our study will include more than 2,600 patients with ASCVD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with these results, Ribas et al reported that just 45% of ACS patients reached LDL levels <70 mg/dL in the 122 days after the ACS, and that the use of Masana's recommendations improved the management and treatment planification in these patients ( 11 ). In addition, Ródenas et al observed that only one third of patients who had suffered a previous myocardial infarction had LDL levels <70 mg/dL during a follow-up period between 2013 and 2018 ( 32 ). These analyses considered a relatively small population of patients, but it is expected that our study will include more than 2,600 patients with ASCVD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this recommendation, managing LDL-C levels remains challenging worldwide and within Canada. 8 , 9 , 10 Indeed, Aref-Eshghi et al. found that 68.6% of high-risk patients (including patients with atherosclerosis, most patients with diabetes, and those with a Framingham risk score ≥ 20%) in Canadian primary care settings had LDL-C levels in excess of guideline-recommended thresholds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…conducted a study in a primary care outpatient setting in Spain and found that only one third of outpatients with a previous myocardial infarction were maintaining LDL-C levels below threshold. 10 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%