2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0031231
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual two-axis control of three singlet-triplet qubits in a micromagnet integrated quantum dot array

Abstract: We report individual confinement and two-axis qubit operations of two electron spin qubits in GaAs gate-defined sextuple quantum dot array with integrated micro-magnet. As a first step toward multiple qubit operations, we demonstrate coherent manipulations of three singlet-triplet qubits showing underdamped Larmor and Ramsey oscillations in all double dot sites. We provide an accurate measure of site-dependent field gradients and rms electric and magnetic noise, and we discuss the adequacy of simple rectangula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future quantum computers promise exponential speed-ups over their classical counterparts in solving certain problems like search and simulation [1]. A wide variety of promising modalities emerges in the race to realize the quantum computer, such as trapped ions [2,3], photonic system [4][5][6][7], nitrogen-vacancy centers [8], nuclear magnetic resonance [9], superconducting circuits [10,11] and semiconductor quantum dots [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Among these the semiconductor quantum dots is a powerful competitor for potential scalability, integrability with existing classical electronics and well-established fabrication technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future quantum computers promise exponential speed-ups over their classical counterparts in solving certain problems like search and simulation [1]. A wide variety of promising modalities emerges in the race to realize the quantum computer, such as trapped ions [2,3], photonic system [4][5][6][7], nitrogen-vacancy centers [8], nuclear magnetic resonance [9], superconducting circuits [10,11] and semiconductor quantum dots [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Among these the semiconductor quantum dots is a powerful competitor for potential scalability, integrability with existing classical electronics and well-established fabrication technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, the model of interest is the semiconductor DQDs system, where the S-T 0 qubit is encoded in the collective spin states of two electrons confined in a double-well potential [14,42]. The Hamiltonian of a single S-T 0 qubit, governed by external electric pulses is [8,9,43,44]…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…σ z and σ x are Pauli matrices and represent rotations of the quantum state around the z-and x-axes with rates J(t) and h, respectively. The coefficient h describes the Zeeman energy splitting between |S and |T 0 , commonly raised by nearby deposited permanent micromagnet [43] and its value is difficult to vary during the quantum gate time in experiment [42,43] (although tunable splitting by Overhauser field has been observed [14], its time consumption is much longer than a typical gate time). We assume h = 1 here to facilitate our theoretical treatment, and take this as the energy unit.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, the model of interest is the semiconductor DQDs system, where the S-T 0 qubit is encoded in the collective spin states of two electrons confined in a double-well potential [14,42]. The Hamiltonian of a single S-T 0 qubit, governed by external electric pulses is [8,9,43,44]…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…σ z and σ x are Pauli matrices and represent rotations of the quantum state around the z-and x-axes with rates J(t) and h, respectively. The coefficient h describes the Zeeman energy splitting between |S⟩ and |T 0 ⟩, commonly raised by nearby deposited permanent micromagnet [43] and its value is difficult to vary during the quantum gate time in experiment [42,43] (although tunable splitting by Overhauser field has been observed [14], its time consumption is much longer than a typical gate time). We assume h = 1 here to facilitate our theoretical treatment, and take this as the energy unit.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%