Individual variation behind the evolution of cooperation

Abstract

One contribution of 18 to a theme issue 'The evolution of cooperation based on direct fitness benefits'. Life on Earth has two remarkable properties. The first is variation: even apart from the vast number of extant species, there are considerable differences between individuals within a single species. The second property is cooperation. It is surprising that until recently the interactions between these two properties have rarely been addressed from an evolutionary point of view. Here, I concentrate on how inter-individual differences influence the evolution of cooperation. First, I deal with cases where individuality is maintained by random processes like mutation or phenotypic noise. Second, I examine when differences in state cause differences in behaviour. Finally, I investigate the effects of individual role specialization. Variation can be important in several ways. Increased random variation can change the expectation about cooperativeness of future partners, altering behaviour in a current relationship. Differences in state may serve as a book-keeping mechanism that is necessary for the evolution of reciprocity. If the cost of cooperation can depend on state then strategic regulation of state makes it possible to coerce partners to cooperate. If conditions force individuals to specialize, cooperation becomes more valuable. My review of theoretical models suggests that variation plays an important role in the evolution of cooperation.

Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group‐living mammal

“…Understanding how the social environment impacts specialisation has important ecological implications. For example, if increased individual differences in foraging preference reduces conflict between group members, then individual specialisation may maintain stable societies and play an important role in the evolution of social systems (Barta ).…”

Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation

“…Reciprocity, the third potential cause of correlated pay-offs, is arguably the most contended possibility to generate cooperation and altruism [12,32]. It is the theme of this article and a focus of many contributions to this special issue of the Philosophical Transactions [7,[33][34][35][36][37].…”

Discounting of Evolutionary Explanations in Sociology Textbooks and Curricula

“…Instead of formulating evolution in terms of competition as the guiding metaphor and sociality as a by-product, cooperation and positive social interactions are now more often seen as the central driving forces of evolution (Maynard Smith and Szathmáry, 1997; FIGURE 3 | A Map of Science created in Pajek (Batagelj and Mrvar, 2016) using the 2010 USCD map of science data and classification system covering 10 years (2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) of Web of Science data and 8 years (2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008) of Scopus data (Börner et al, 2012). Sussman and Cloninger, 2011;Pierce and Bekoff, 2012;Barta, 2016).…”